Judging Freedom
Scott Ritter: Why Would US Fight in Yemen?
Mar 24, 2025
Scott Ritter, military intelligence expert and former UN weapons inspector, delves into the intricate U.S. military involvement in Yemen. He challenges misleading narratives around bombing campaigns, questioning their effectiveness and humanity. Ritter emphasizes the moral dilemmas of targeting civilians and the risks of escalating tensions with Iran. He also critiques racial disparities in American foreign policy, noting how systemic biases affect responses to violence. The conversation underscores the complexities of international security and military readiness in the Middle East.
27:39
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- U.S. bombing campaigns in Yemen have led to extensive civilian casualties and fail to achieve intended military objectives, raising ethical concerns.
- Tensions between the U.S. and Iran are escalating, highlighting potential risks for regional stability and U.S.-Russia relations amidst outdated military strategies.
Deep dives
The Illusion of Success in Military Strikes
Recent discussions have focused on the perceived success of U.S. bombing campaigns in Yemen, with claims from officials that they have achieved military objectives. However, a critical analysis reveals a significant disconnect between official narratives and the on-ground reality. Evidence suggests that many strikes target civilian areas rather than military installations, leading to widespread collateral damage without impacting military capabilities such as those of the Houthis. This raises questions about the effectiveness of U.S. intelligence and operational strategies, highlighting the likelihood that bombing campaigns are not achieving their intended goals.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
