Judging Freedom Scott Ritter: Why Would US Fight in Yemen?
26 snips
Mar 24, 2025 
Scott Ritter, military intelligence expert and former UN weapons inspector, delves into the intricate U.S. military involvement in Yemen. He challenges misleading narratives around bombing campaigns, questioning their effectiveness and humanity. Ritter emphasizes the moral dilemmas of targeting civilians and the risks of escalating tensions with Iran. He also critiques racial disparities in American foreign policy, noting how systemic biases affect responses to violence. The conversation underscores the complexities of international security and military readiness in the Middle East.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Yemen Bombing Success Doubtful
- Scott Ritter doubts the President's claim of a successful Yemen bombing.
- He believes the targets were likely insignificant and unrelated to actual military objectives.
Outdated Intelligence Leading to Civilian Casualties
- Scott Ritter suggests the U.S. military may be bombing outdated or irrelevant targets in Yemen.
- He believes poor intelligence and scraping the bottom of the barrel are resulting in civilian casualties.
Criticism of US Approach to Iran
- Scott Ritter criticizes the U.S. approach to Iran, advocating for negotiation instead of threats.
- He warns that an attack on Iran could shatter trust with Russia and lead to a dangerous escalation.