Post Game with Peter Baker: 'Retribution is the definition' of Trump's campaign
Sep 17, 2023
auto_awesome
Peter Baker, NY Times correspondent, joins Kristen Welker to analyze her interview with former President Trump, discussing false election claims, potential self-pardoning, and ongoing legal challenges. They delve into his defiance, dubious legal defense, admiration for Putin, and Trump's failure to condemn Putin's actions. They also discuss the unrealistic claim of ending a war in 24 hours and recent events including Hunter Biden's indictments.
Former President Trump continues to distort facts and maintain his false narrative about the 2020 election, appealing to his base's distrust of experts and evidence.
Trump's shifting stance on his legal defense weakens his argument, hinders his legal strategy, and raises questions about his involvement in obstructing justice.
Deep dives
Defiance and Distortion
Former President Trump's interview with Kristen Welker showcased his defiant attitude, as he continues to refuse to concede or accept any criticism. Throughout the interview, Trump consistently distorted facts and created his own version of reality, particularly regarding the 2020 election. He staunchly maintains that the election was rigged, despite the lack of evidence, and shows no signs of backing down. This unwavering defiance resonates with his base, who appreciate his refusal to conform to the perspectives of experts and evidence.
Legal Troubles and Contradictions
During the interview, former President Trump discussed his legal defense and the ongoing criminal charges he faces. Despite previously suggesting that he was acting on advice of counsel, he now claims that he acted on his own instincts regarding the allegations of election fraud. This contradiction weakens his argument and exposes the challenges his lawyers face in court. Trump's shifting stance and his inability to provide consistent answers may hinder his legal strategy. Additionally, the discussion about the Mar-a-Lago documents raised questions about Trump's involvement in obstructing justice, further complicating his legal position.
Abortion, Foreign Policy, and Retribution
The former president's stance on abortion proved evasive, as he avoided taking a clear position on a federal ban and emphasized the need for negotiation and compromise. This highlighted the complexity and sensitivity of the issue, which remains deeply personal for many Americans. In terms of foreign policy, Trump maintained his belief that he could end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours, despite the impracticality and lack of evidence to support such a claim. Overall, the interview revealed Trump's main objective: retribution. He openly expressed his desire to seek revenge against his political enemies and dismantle the so-called 'deep state.' This focus on retribution shapes the core of his campaign and appeals to a segment of voters who prioritize loyalty over policy goals.
Peter Baker, chief White House correspondent for the New York Times, joins Kristen Welker to analyze her interview with former President Trump — from his continued false statements surrounding the integrity of the 2020 election, to his surprise statement that he'd considered pardoning himself after January 6.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode