Nate Persley, a Stanford Law School professor and expert on election interference, joins the discussion on election integrity and the final stretch of the presidential campaign. They delve into rising concerns over misinformation and legal challenges, particularly in Pennsylvania. The conversation highlights the unpredictable nature of voter dynamics, intensified by celebrity endorsements and political rhetoric. They also explore the role of media in shaping public trust during these tumultuous times, emphasizing the necessity of safeguarding electoral integrity.
The stark contrast in campaign strategies between Trump and Harris illuminates the challenges of influencing undecided voters amidst early participation.
Concerns over election integrity highlight the potential legal battles that could arise, emphasizing the need for public trust in the electoral process.
The backlash against major publications for withholding endorsements reflects the complex relationship between journalistic integrity and public trust in today's media.
Deep dives
Final Campaign Moments
The podcast focuses on the critical final days of the presidential campaign, noting how both candidates, Trump and Harris, are making their closing arguments. Trump’s aggressive rallying style contrasts with Harris’s more traditional approach, illustrating the stark differences in their campaign strategies. There’s an acknowledgment that the notion of 'closing arguments' is somewhat outdated, as many voters have already participated in early voting. The hosts express skepticism about the effectiveness of these final pitches in influencing undecided voters, emphasizing the unique and tumultuous context of this election.
Impact of Controversial Remarks
The discussion highlights the potential repercussions of remarks made by both candidates, particularly Trump's controversial comments that may alienate certain voter groups, such as Puerto Ricans. There’s concern that negative remarks during rallies can ignite backlash, which may ultimately affect voter sentiment in critical swing states. The speakers also consider how past behaviors, such as Trump’s insensitivity during Hurricane Maria's aftermath, may influence voters' decisions now. Overall, they ponder the tuning out effect of constant controversy and whether it galvanizes or deters voter support.
Legal Concerns in Voting
The podcast features an expert discussion on possible legal challenges that could arise around the election process, particularly in key battleground states like Pennsylvania. Concerns about inconsistencies in ballot processing and accusations of voter roll inaccuracies contribute to a fearful atmosphere, with potential legal battles looming in close races. The expert reassures listeners that the system has legal safeguards in place to handle such disputes, minimizing fears of outright electoral chaos. However, they stress the importance of maintaining public trust in the election process amid rising tensions.
Media's Role in Influencing Perceptions
A significant topic examined is the role of media, particularly in the context of major publications like the Washington Post, refraining from endorsing candidates. This decision reflects a perceived shift in maintaining journalistic integrity versus becoming part of the electoral narrative. The discussion also addresses the backlash faced by the Post after losing a substantial number of subscribers, suggesting that ownership decisions can have far-reaching consequences for public trust and media credibility. This incident raises questions about the separation between editorial positions and journalistic reporting in today's media landscape.
Celebrity Influence in Politics
The episode concludes with a look at the role of celebrity endorsements in the current political landscape and whether they sway electorate opinions. While some argue that famous endorsements can energize campaigns, the hosts express skepticism regarding their overall effectiveness in changing voter behavior. They analyze how celebrities may resonate differently across demographics and how messages might be perceived as condescending among less politically active individuals. Ultimately, the discussion suggests that while celebrity endorsements can enhance visibility, they may not translate to meaningful voter engagement.
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss the final week of the presidential campaign; the threats to election integrity; and the consequences of not endorsing. Join us on December 4 for Political Gabfest Live in Brooklyn! Tickets are on sale now. And send us your Conundrums at slate.com/conundrum.
Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.)
Podcast production by Cheyna Roth
Research by Julie Huygen
Want more Political Gabfest? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Political Gabfest show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or visit slate.com/gabfestplus to get access wherever you listen.
