Ted Frank, a legendary class action lawyer, discusses his career and debunking part of Justice Jackson's opinion. The hosts recap the oral argument of Trump v. Anderson, exploring legal issues. They also discuss two opinions on whistleblower protections and false credit reporting. The podcast delves into flaws in the class action system and the importance of prioritizing recovery for the class. They delve into Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase's ruling and discuss impeachment trials presided over by Chief Justices.
Consumers can sue federal agencies for negligent reporting, as sovereign immunity does not apply in such cases.
Whistleblowers claiming retaliation only need to prove that their whistleblowing was a factor in their termination, simplifying the burden of proof.
Deep dives
Department of Agriculture vs Kurtz
In a unanimous decision, Justice Gorsuch ruled that a consumer can sue a federal agency for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The case involved Kurtz, who secured and repaid a loan from the Department of Agriculture, but the department incorrectly reported the loan as unpaid, severely damaging Kurtz's credit. The court held that sovereign immunity does not apply in this case, allowing consumers to sue federal agencies for negligent reporting.
Murray vs UBS Securities
In another unanimous decision, Justice Sotomayor wrote that a whistleblower who claims to be fired for whistleblowing only needs to prove that their whistleblowing was a factor in their employer's decision to terminate them. The ruling establishes that retaliatory intent does not need to be proven. This decision simplifies the burden of proof for whistleblowers in such cases.
Trump vs Anderson
This highly anticipated case centers around the qualification of Donald Trump as a candidate in Colorado. The Colorado Supreme Court disqualified Trump based on the 14th Amendment's Section 3, claiming he engaged in insurrection. The key issues discussed during oral arguments were whether a state court can disqualify a candidate, whether the President is considered an officer of the United States, and the practical implications of a decision. Based on the oral arguments, experts predict the decision will likely be in favor of Trump.
Ted Frank and the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute
Ted Frank is a prominent attorney and the director of the Center for Class Action Fairness, which is part of the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute. The Center focuses on litigating class action cases to ensure fair treatment for both plaintiffs and defendants. They challenge settlement agreements that prioritize attorney fees over the interests of class members. Ted Frank gained recognition for his Wall Street Journal op-ed debunking misleading statistics used in a recent Supreme Court case.
This week brings us the biggest oral argument of the term: Trump v. Anderson, which will decide whether states can disqualify President Trump from the ballot. Your hosts recap the complicated legal issues and explore oral arguments. Zack and GianCarlo also discuss the two opinions released this week, which involve whistleblower protections and suing the government for false credit reporting. Zack interviews legendary class action lawyer Ted Frank who talks about his career and his now-famous debunking of part of Justice Jackson's opinion in the affirmative action cases. Lastly, Zack takes the trivia hot-seat to answer questions about Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase.
Follow us on X (formerly Twitter) @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.