Divided Argument

Natural Side Effect

Feb 27, 2025
The hosts dive into the latest Supreme Court dynamics, highlighting the Trump administration's implications and intricate judicial processes. They explore the evolving standards for legal advocacy and navigate the complexities of capital cases, particularly focusing on Glossop v. Oklahoma. Discussions include issues of jurisdiction, prosecutorial misconduct, and the ripple effects of landmark decisions like Dobbs. With a blend of humor and sharp legal insights, they also reflect on the transition from live shows to studio recordings, sharing personal and professional anecdotes.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ANECDOTE

Live Show Jitters

  • Several people commented that Will and Dan seemed more nervous during live shows.
  • Dan jokingly suggested the commenters were being unkind.
INSIGHT

Summary Reversals Decline

  • Adam Liptak's New York Times article discusses a decline in Supreme Court summary reversals.
  • He engages with legal scholarship, including a student note on the topic.
INSIGHT

Summary Reversals Explained

  • Summary reversals, where the Court reverses a lower court decision without full briefing or argument, have decreased.
  • This aligns with Dan's observations, though other shadow docket activities continue.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app