A young man challenges authority during lockdown and finds himself under arrest for a horrific crime. He reflects on his upbringing, discusses his involvement with a militia group, and the arrest of individuals charged with conspiracy to kidnap the governor. The chapter ends with a teaser for the next episode and a podcast promotion.
The trial surrounding the alleged plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Whitmer revealed the complexities and ambiguities of the case, blurring the line between true intentions and the influence of undercover informants.
The case highlights the dangers of demonizing and polarizing individuals or groups, emphasizing the importance of approaching complex cases with nuance and considering the impact of rhetoric on public perception and unity.
Deep dives
The Rise of Suspicion and Culture Wars During Lockdown
During the pandemic, a culture war erupted between safety and freedom, with distrust of authority on the rise. This story focuses on Brandon Casserta, a young man who became embroiled in a shocking incident related to his mistrust of authority. Brandon's journey began by seeking self-improvement through literature, including Jordan Peterson's 12 Rules for Life. He then joined a local militia group and engaged in firearms training and discussions about arresting politicians. However, ambiguities arose regarding the extent of their plans and intentions, with some alleging a coordinated conspiracy of white supremacists. Brandon and others were eventually arrested and faced trial, but the verdicts were mixed, leaving ambiguity and divisiveness about the case's true nature.
The Ambiguous Nature of the Kidnap Plot
The trial surrounding the alleged plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Whitmer was filled with ambiguities and contradictions. Some members of the group, which included Brandon, made violent statements and engaged in discussions about various actions, yet it was unclear when these conversations crossed the line into actual planning. Undercover informants played significant roles, blurring the line between true intentions and encouragement by others. While some evidence pointed to serious planning, other evidence suggested they were too incompetent and stoned to carry out such a plot. Ultimately, the jury reached a mixed verdict, further emphasizing the complexity and ambiguity of the case.
The Consequences of Demonizing and Polarizing
The case of the alleged kidnapping plot highlights the dangers of demonizing and polarizing individuals or groups. The narrative that painted the defendants as white supremacists fueled by a desire to start a civil war was based on research models from overseas rather than specific research into the individuals involved. Such labeling and demonization can create a self-fulfilling prophecy and worsen divisions in society. It is crucial to approach these complex cases with nuance and consider the impact of rhetoric on public perception and unity.
How a disenfranchised young man, maddened by the strict lockdown laws in Michigan, joined a club of like-minded men and suddenly found himself under arrest for the most unlikely and horrific crime.
Written and presented by Jon Ronson
Produced by Sarah Shebbeare
Original music by Phil Channell
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode