High control religions often trivialize legitimate critiques of faith deconstruction through dismissive tactics that undermine serious discussion.
The strategy of making superficial changes creates an illusion of responsiveness while preserving the core beliefs and authority of high control institutions.
Deep dives
The Challenges of Deconstruction in High Control Religions
High control religions often respond to faith deconstruction with attempts to trivialize the legitimate concerns raised by individuals questioning their beliefs. These responses aim to gaslight those undergoing deconstruction, suggesting that their criticisms are not significant or can be easily resolved without substantial changes within the religious structure. A common tactic is the 'it's an easy fix' response, which gives the impression of understanding and compassion while simultaneously masking the underlying issues that would require deep systemic changes. This approach can lead to the deconstructionist feeling unheard and dismissed, as their valid points are minimized to mere inconveniences.
The Receding Horizon of Promised Change
One prevalent method employed by high control religions is the concept of the receding horizon, wherein promises of change are made but never fully realized. This strategy buys time and allows institutions to defer addressing the core issues raised by critics, effectively stringing them along indefinitely. As critics seek updates on promised changes, they often encounter excuses that prolong their frustrations without delivering any tangible results. This dynamic highlights how these religious bodies know that genuine solutions would require dismantling the structures that sustain their control and authority.
Cosmetic Changes: The Lipstick on a Pig
Another common response from high control religions involves making cosmetic changes that create the illusion of responsiveness to criticism without affecting the underlying beliefs and practices. These superficial adjustments, such as adopting more contemporary language or promoting a message of inclusivity, do not challenge the fundamental tenets of high control Christianity that maintain their authority and exclusivity. For instance, churches may emphasize open-mindedness while still upholding traditional gender roles or selective inclusivity, thus failing to address critical societal issues. Ultimately, these strategies mask the reality that high control religions often remain unchanged at their core, leaving deconstructionists feeling frustrated and marginalized.
Subscribe for $5.99 a month to get bonus content most Mondays, bonus episodes every month, ad-free listening, access to the entire 800-episode archive, Discord access, and more: https://axismundi.supercast.com/
“It’s An Easy Fix”
“It’s an easy fix.” That’s what the proponents of high control religion often say in response to those who ask hard questions or level pointed critiques. But is it an “easy fix”? If not, what is the strategy behind suggesting that it is? How does the assertion that high-control religion can “easily” be modified actually work to maintain it? Why should we recognize that this response aims to coerce and maintain control over would-be faith deconstructors? Join Dan in this episode as he explores these questions and issues.
