Adam Kirsch, a notable critic and writer, dives deep into the contentious debate surrounding settler colonialism in relation to Israel. He explores the claim that Israel's existence is illegitimate, drawing parallels with American colonial history. The conversation also touches on how modern political discourse is influenced by these historical narratives, including their implications for current conflicts. Kirsch critiques the romanticized views of Indigenous peoples and examines the role of 'wokeness' in contemporary discussions of privilege and guilt.
Critics of Israel argue that its legitimacy is undermined by a historical narrative of settler colonialism, creating a persistent moral hierarchy.
The ideology of settler colonialism reshapes current societal identities, fostering a sense of unending inherited guilt for past injustices.
Deep dives
The Concept of Settler Colonialism
Settler colonialism is often viewed as a lens through which critics can delegitimize states like Israel and the United States by framing their histories as fundamentally unjust. Proponents assert that such nations were established through the displacement of indigenous peoples, creating a narrative in which current populations inherit historical guilt. This ongoing critique posits that nations built on settler colonialism are perpetually illegitimate, with moral implications extending to every generation. By applying this ideology not only to Israel but also to progressive movements within the U.S., critics equate the actions of modern states with historical injustices, thereby framing present conflicts as the continuation of colonial legacies.
The Elasticity of Guilt
The ideological framework of settler colonialism alters perceptions of historical time, suggesting that guilt for past actions remains ever-present, impacting current generations without resolution. Influential theorists argue that colonization is not simply an event that occurred in the past, but a continuous structure that shapes modern societies and identities. As a result, individuals who are not of indigenous descent are categorized as settlers, regardless of their lineage or duration of residency. This notion leads to a pervasive sense of inherited culpability, contributing to a mindset that seeks to rectify historical wrongs through social and political upheaval.
Wokeness and Inherited Guilt
The rise of progressive political movements draws parallels to traditional religious frameworks, as adherents publicly acknowledge their perceived sins related to settler colonialism. This ritualistic confession allows individuals to emphasize their moral superiority by criticizing contemporary societal structures they deem harmful or unjust. However, unlike in traditional religious contexts where forgiveness is possible, the ideology of settler colonialism posits that one's inherited guilt is indelible and cannot be expunged. Thus, a cycle of guilt and virtue emerges, where acknowledgment of one's settler identity becomes a marker of moral prestige.
Impacts on Conflicts and Real-World Consequences
The application of settler colonialism as an analytical tool can produce dangerous real-world consequences, particularly in ongoing conflicts like that of Israel and Palestine. The belief that armed resistance against a settler state is justified can embolden individuals to support violent actions without considering the complexity of the situation. While the ideologies behind settler colonialism emerge from theoretical frameworks, they can morph into justifications for real-life atrocities and terror. This dynamic illustrates the potential for academic ideas to bleed into political action, often with tragic results, highlighting the need for critical examination of such frameworks before applying them to contemporary conflicts.
Israel’s critics today like to argue that the country is illegitimate because it is the product of what they call settler colonialism. They consider non-Jewish Arab peoples the native inhabitants of the land—inhabitants who were displaced by the appearance of Jewish immigrants over the last 150 years. The great colonial moment was capped in 1948, when the Jews established political sovereignty in the state of Israel; then, subsequent wars, including and especially the Six Day War of 1967, further expanded and entrenched that moment.
According to this sort of analysis, Israel is always and forever illegitimate. Much the same is seen as true of America, which was not only illegitimate at the moment it seized native lands, but is still illegitimate, and will always be illegitimate. This dynamic is captured in a comment by Patrick Wolfe, a frequently quoted Australian scholar of settler colonialism: “invasion is a structure, not an event.”
This worldview establishes a moral hierarchy, draws political alliances, establishes political adversaries, and has been at the root of the ideological assault on Israel and its allies. It’s an idea that the critic and writer Adam Kirsch explores in his new book, On Settler Colonialism, published recently by W.W. Norton & Company. Here he joins host Jonathan Silver for a discussion of his book and the controversy around Israel.
Musical selections in this podcast are drawn from the Quintet for Clarinet and Strings, op. 31a, composed by Paul Ben-Haim and performed by the ARC Ensemble.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode