Explosive DA Fani Willis and Nathan Wade Testimony - What Happens Next? With Dave Aronberg and Mike Davis | Ep. 726
Feb 16, 2024
auto_awesome
Lawyers Dave Aronberg and Mike Davis join Megyn Kelly to discuss the explosive testimony of Fani Willis and Nathan Wade. They analyze the credibility of their testimonies, question the cash payments, and explore the romantic relationship between Willis and Wade. They also delve into witness testimonies, perjury issues, controversy over campaign funds, and speculate on potential legal consequences.
Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade provided no evidence or receipts to support their claim of cash reimbursements for lavish trips.
Discrepancies in testimonies and defensive behavior raise questions about the credibility of Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade.
Despite claiming cash transactions, Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade failed to provide any supporting evidence, such as receipts or deposit slips.
Deep dives
Claimed reimbursement in cash without evidence
Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade claimed that she reimbursed him for their lavish trips in cash, without providing any evidence or receipts to support their claim.
Discrepancies in testimonies
There were discrepancies in the testimonies of Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade regarding the timeline and nature of their relationship, raising questions about their credibility.
Lack of evidence for payments made in cash
Despite claiming to have made payments in cash, Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade failed to provide any receipts, deposit slips, or other evidence to support their assertions.
Defensiveness and anger during testimony
Fannie Willis displayed defensiveness and anger during her testimony, sometimes diverting from answering questions directly, potentially indicating attempts to obfuscate and hinder the investigation.
Podcast Summary
The podcast episode discusses the ongoing legal cases involving former President Donald Trump, specifically focusing on the civil fraud case against him, the Stormy Daniels hush money case, and the January 6th federal prosecution. The summary highlights the verdict expected in the civil fraud case, the upcoming trial in the hush money case, and the potential delays in the Georgia case. It also mentions the possibility of the Supreme Court getting involved in the January 6th case. Finally, the summary mentions the key individuals involved, including former President Trump, Fannie Willis, Nathan Wade, and Robin Yeardy, and highlights the potential legal consequences they may face.
Megyn Kelly is joined by lawyers Dave Aronberg and Mike Davis to talk about the explosive Fani Willis and Nathan Wade testimony yesterday, the question about Willis paying in cash only, whether Wade and Willis actually lied to the court, the key element about when the affair started, the relevance of attorney-client privilege, important testimony from Willis' former friend and colleague, the media pushing the line that the friend is "disgruntled," Nathan Wade's reasoning for having no "receipts" showing his travel with Fani Willis, the importance of "cash" transactions for everything, whether Wade lied on his "interrogatories," Willis' fiery moments attacking other lawyers and even Nathan Wade, her emotional outbursts in court, what deception expert Phil Houston said about Willis' answers, what the judge might do next and how it affects the Trump RICO case, big news about the Hunter Biden special counsel charging an ex-FBI informant now, and more.