

The Campaign To Silence Journalists & Undermine Free Speech
61 snips Mar 11, 2025
David Enrich, the Business investigations editor for the New York Times and author of "Murder the Truth," delves into the alarming rise of legal threats against journalists. He discusses the pivotal New York Times Co. v. Sullivan case and its crucial role in safeguarding free speech. Enrich highlights how current political climates are reshaping libel laws, the chilling effects of legal malice, and the evolving definitions of public figures. This conversation underscores the urgent need for robust protections for independent journalism in an increasingly hostile environment.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
NYT v. Sullivan Impact
- The 1964 NYT v. Sullivan case strengthened First Amendment protections.
- It enabled journalists to pursue truth without constant fear of lawsuits.
Trump's Campaign Promise
- During his 2016 campaign, Trump pledged to "open up libel laws."
- He wanted to make it easier to sue journalists for negative articles.
Legal Threats Surge
- David Enrich noticed increased legal threats against journalists investigating powerful figures.
- Smaller outlets and independent journalists are especially vulnerable.