Church Educators Fired for Opposing Mormon Racism | Ep. 1923
Jul 31, 2024
auto_awesome
Dive into the struggles of church educators who opposed historical racial policies in Mormonism. Discover the clash between free-thinking scholars and conservative leaders that led to firings and excommunications. Explore how figures like David O. McKay defended intellectual freedom during a time of civil rights upheaval. Delve into the tensions at BYU between faith and academic pursuits, and witness the church's grappling with evolving racial doctrines amid societal change. Uncover the legacy of race and doctrine within this transformative era.
The 1950s and 60s saw the rise of dissent among church educators, leading to conflicts over the church's restrictive racial policies.
Figures like Sterling McMurren and Lowell Benion emerged as critical voices, advocating for a reevaluation of the priesthood ban affecting Black members.
Brigham Young University became a battleground for debates on academic freedom versus adherence to conservative theological perspectives within the church.
The civil rights movement of the 1960s pressured church leaders to confront their long-standing racial doctrines amidst national calls for equality.
J. Reuben Clark's 1938 address reinforced the necessity for doctrinal purity, discouraging progressive views and shaping church education for generations.
Deep dives
Dissent Among Church Educators
During the period from the 1940s to the 1970s, many church educators within the Mormon Church began to voice dissent against the church's restrictive racial policies, particularly the priesthood ban affecting Black members. Notable figures like Sterling McMurren, Lowell Benion, and T. Edgar Lyon emerged as outspoken critics, expressing their concerns about the morality and scriptural basis of the ban. Their efforts shed light on the complex relationship between church doctrine and the evolving perspectives on race, ultimately leading to a crisis within the church's leadership about how to manage dissenting voices. This movement marked a significant moment in the struggle for racial equality within the church as educators sought to reconcile their faith with their moral standpoints.
Expectations of Church Educators
The expectations placed on church educators were shaped by the early teachings of church founders, which emphasized the need to teach from a lens of spiritual authority. In the early 20th century, these educators were urged to incorporate secular knowledge into their teachings, but this often led to tension when secular ideas, especially those concerning evolution and biblical criticism, conflicted with church doctrine. As educators began to incorporate these secular perspectives into their classrooms, church leaders reacted by dismissing those perceived as too liberal or divergent from orthodoxy. This created a challenging environment for many educators who sought to balance intellectual inquiry with the rigid demands of church teachings.
History and Influence of BYU Faculty
Brigham Young University (BYU), as a major institution for LDS education, became a focal point for the tensions surrounding academic freedom and church doctrine. The hiring of faculty members with progressive views on racial issues, like those trained in secular scholarship, sparked heated debates within the church hierarchy. The church's insistence on maintaining doctrinal purity often clashed with the professors’ desire to promote rigorous academic exploration, leading to the dismissal of several prominent educators. This dynamic illustrated the struggle between fostering an enlightened scholarly environment and adhering to the conservative theological perspectives mandated by the church's leadership.
National Context of Racial Issues
The national civil rights movements of the 1960s pressed various religious institutions, including the Mormon Church, to confront their racial policies. Amid significant social upheaval and growing demands for equality, church leaders faced increasing pressure to address their own long-standing policies that discriminated against Black individuals. The release of government surveys and critical articles in major publications highlighted the profound challenges facing the church as it attempted to reconcile its teachings with the realities of racial discrimination in American society. As activists called for change, the church's reluctance to adapt its doctrines showcased the internal conflicts between maintaining tradition and advocating for justice.
Reuben Clark's Legacy
J. Reuben Clark's influential 1938 address to church educators set a precedent for strict adherence to church doctrine, restricting the inclusion of progressive ideas in church teachings. His remarks emphasized the importance of maintaining doctrinal purity, discouraging educators from integrating liberal viewpoints into their teachings. This speech, coupled with Clark's later actions, reinforced the notion that dissenting opinions on race or scripture were neither welcome nor tolerated within the church education system. His legacy had long-lasting repercussions that affected generations of church members and educators in navigating the challenges of doctrinal interpretation versus cultural change.
The Impact of Church Leadership
The responses of church leadership to social pressures significantly influenced the trajectory of racial policies within the church. General Authorities like Joseph Fielding Smith and Ezra Taft Benson played critical roles in perpetuating the priesthood ban, often framing their opposition to racial equality in the context of traditional doctrine. Their resistance to change, paired with the public's growing awareness of civil rights issues, created an environment ripe for dissent among church members. These dynamics highlighted the crucial role that church leaders played in shaping both the internal discourse on race and the church's broader societal image during a pivotal era of American history.
Dissenters and Their Experiences
Influential dissenters like Sterling McMurren shared their experiences to challenge the church's racial policies and encourage a dialogue on equality. McMurren's involvement with the NAACP allowed for a unique platform to advocate for change and pressure church leadership to reexamine their stance on race. His actions were met with resistance from church authorities, who viewed such dissent as a threat to the established doctrine. This tension reflected the broader context of the civil rights movement and illuminated how dissenting voices within the church were striving to effect change against enduring orthodox beliefs.
Conflict with Federal Legislation
The church’s position on race came under renewed scrutiny when significant civil rights legislation moved through Congress in the 1960s. Despite the potential for positive change in the church's racial policies, many church leaders resisted endorsing the Civil Rights Act due to fears of significant backlash from conservative membership. This resistance exemplified the struggle between long-held traditions within the church and the shifting societal views on race and equality. Consequently, church leaders found themselves walking a tightrope as they attempted to navigate the demands for progress while reconciling their commitments to historical doctrine.
The Role of Interracial Representation
The portrayal of interracial relationships within church publications became a contentious issue, reflecting deeper societal fears and prejudices. Concerns expressed by church members about such representations stemmed from deeply ingrained beliefs about race and the perceived threat of a changing social landscape. Church leadership's directives to avoid portraying interracial couples in official literature signified an attempt to maintain traditional views compatible with long-held doctrines. This tactic to suppress representation demonstrated the church's struggle to adapt to changing attitudes toward race, further isolating it within the broader context of American society.
Protests and Community Response
When negative media coverage and public criticism spotlighted the church's racial policies, members of the LDS community reacted with both support and outrage. Many churchgoers were appalled by the racial discrimination espoused by leaders and sought to voice their dissent through letters and protests, highlighting growing discontent with church policies. The public protests against the church's handling of racial issues created a platform for critical discussions within the faith community. This collective response indicated a pivotal moment where members began to challenge their leaders, reflecting a broader shift in attitudes toward race and equality amidst growing national consciousness around social justice.
In the 1950s and 60s, the Mormon church faced internal turmoil as a group of intellectuals known as the "Swearing Elders" challenged orthodox doctrines. This clash between free-thinking scholars and conservative leaders like Joseph Fielding Smith led to attempts at excommunication, spy infiltration, and the firing of liberal educators. Amidst this tension, Church President David O. McKay emerged as an unexpected protector of intellectual freedom. The period also saw the church grappling with civil rights issues and racial policies, as public pressure forced leaders to confront their teachings. This tumultuous era set the stage for decades of struggle between faith, scholarship, and authority in Mormonism.
We are thrilled to announce that we have reached our donation goal to compensate Dr. Matt Harris for his contributions to this series. We sincerely thank everyone who supported this effort. While the goal to pay Matt has been met, producing this series incurred significant costs for the Open Stories Foundation. If you find value in this content and want to help cover these expenses and support future productions, we encourage you to donate at https://www.mormonstories.org/donate/ Your generosity makes a difference—thank you!
