New York City cops fight against a broken computer system that promotes racist and corrupt policing. The pressure to manipulate crime rates leads to unjust targeting and discrimination. A class action lawsuit is filed against the NYPD to stop the quota system. The hosts discuss hope for change and a new documentary.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The pressure to maintain low crime rates resulted in manipulation of crime reports, downplaying serious offenses, and focusing on quantity over quality in policing.
The introduction of broken windows policing exacerbated the focus on low-level offenses and racial profiling, overshadowing the purpose of quality of life enforcement and community safety concerns.
Deep dives
Unintended Consequences of Crime Rate Pressure
The pressure to keep the crime rate going down had unintended consequences, leading to crime report manipulation and downgrading. Commanding officers were afraid to add any crimes to their stats, resulting in ignoring or downplaying serious offenses. This pressure caused senior officers to manipulate crime reports, refuse to take crime reports from victims, and even write down false information. The goal was to artificially lower the crime rate and show high police activity without focusing on actual crime-solving or addressing community safety concerns.
The Impact of Broken Windows Policing
The introduction of broken windows policing further exacerbated the pressure on officers to show high police activity. Instead of targeting individuals committing serious crimes, the emphasis shifted to low-level offenses and summonsing black and Latino individuals. The focus on activity and quotas resulted in innocent people being targeted based on their race rather than actual criminal behavior. This approach overshadowed the purpose of quality of life enforcement and created a system where arrests and summonses were prioritized over effectively addressing crime patterns.
The Machine's Influence on Policing
The system built by Jack Maple had transformed into a machine driven by the obsession with maintaining low crime rates and high police activity. The pressure from higher authorities, including mayors and commissioners, put intense scrutiny on commanding officers to keep crime numbers down. This pressure led to the manipulation of crime reports and the prioritization of quantity over quality in policing. The machine created an environment where officers focused on meeting quotas and engaging in activity, rather than effectively addressing real crime and ensuring community safety.
The Battle for Change
Despite facing immense challenges and resistance, some police officers, like Edwin Raymond and Pedro Serrano, decided to fight against the machine. They filed lawsuits and brought attention to the unfair quota system and racial biases ingrained in policing. While their initial legal battle did not bring immediate change, their efforts resonated with other officers who began speaking out against the machine. Slowly, the tide may be turning as more chiefs and officers express support for change, offering hope that the system can be transformed to prioritize genuine crime-solving and community well-being.
New York City cops are in a fight against their own police department. They say it’s under the control of a broken computer system that punishes cops who refuse to engage in racist, corrupt policing. The story of their fight, and the story of the grouchy idealist who originally built the machine they’re fighting.