The Editors Episode 834: A So-So Speech
13 snips
Dec 19, 2025 The hosts dive into Trump's recent speech, exploring its focus on economic achievements and the mixed reactions it elicited. They unpack how voters' memories of inflation shape their current perceptions. A thought-provoking debate emerges over whether visual data can alter economic attitudes. They also tackle the controversial impact of modern affirmative action and discuss cultural backlash against liberalism. Light-hearted banter about the Kennedy Center renaming and whimsical ideas for plaque names adds a humorous twist.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Timing Undermines Trump's Economic Case
- Trump framed his speech as a traditional new-president case: predecessor failed, progress under his policies, give time for results.
- But Rich Lowry and Charles Cooke argue Trump's timing, tariffs, and refusal to admit problems weaken that case.
Wages Drive Voter Sentiment
- The rise in real wages matters more politically than headline inflation because sustained wage gains make people feel better.
- Rich Lowry warns wages must rise faster and be felt before next November for political benefit.
Incoherent Messaging Harms Persuasion
- Trump insists the economy is already great while also blaming Biden, creating incoherence voters notice.
- Cooke says he can't both ask for time and pretend people aren't unhappy, which undercuts persuasion.