The Atheist Experience #20.33: Was Joseph Smith a Con Man?
Aug 22, 2016
The discussion dives into the controversial figure of Joseph Smith and the complexities of his historical claims. It explores whether his actions could be viewed as cons rather than divine inspiration. A lively debate unfolds around the illusion of free will, questioning the extent of individual responsibility in a materialistic universe. The hosts also tackle the implications of literal biblical events versus historical interpretations, along with the fascinating dynamics of belief, skepticism, and the social functions of atheism.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Literal Flood vs Local Flood
- The Biblical flood story demands a literal global flood to make sense in context of Noah's Ark.
- Interpreting it as a local flood loses the literal meaning and contradicts the text's claims.
Ark's Impractical Construction
- Noah building a wooden ark at biblical dimensions would have been impossible with Bronze Age tools.
- Even modern wood shipbuilding has limitations that contradict the ark's size and seaworthiness.
Compatibilist Free Will Explained
- Matt Dillahunty highlights compatibilist free will, compatible with determinism.
- He emphasizes personal responsibility while noting much of the free will concept is illusion.