

Stormy Daniels' Inconsistencies, and Judge Losing Control of Trial, with Julian Epstein and Phil Holloway | Ep. 786
May 9, 2024
Julian Epstein, a seasoned Democratic lawyer known for his role during Bill Clinton’s impeachment, joins legal analyst Phil Holloway to dissect Stormy Daniels' testimony in the Trump trial. They examine the inconsistencies in her narrative and how the judge appears to have lost control of the proceedings. The discussion touches on media sensationalism, the potential prejudicial nature of her claims, and the implications of her admitted bias against Trump. They also delve into legal complexities surrounding related cases and the ethical concerns raised by actions of key figures in the trial.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Stormy's Shifting Narrative
- In 2018, Stormy Daniels told 60 Minutes this wasn't a #MeToo situation.
- After watching Bombshell, she now claims a power imbalance existed.
Blackout vs. "Not Bad"
- Stormy Daniels testified she "blacked out" during the encounter with Trump.
- This contradicts her 2011 InTouch interview, where she called the sex "not bad."
Trial a "Dumpster Fire"
- Julian Epstein believes the judge lost control, mirroring Clinton's impeachment.
- He says the focus on irrelevant details is "reversible error."