Evan Thomas, an author known for his deep dives into historical events, analyzes the crucial decisions that led to the atomic bombings during WWII. He discusses the moral dilemmas faced by U.S. leaders and the struggle of Japanese commanders in the face of defeat. Meanwhile, reviewer John Powers shares insights on 'The Instigators,' a new action comedy featuring Matt Damon and Casey Affleck, blending humor with heist chaos. Together, they navigate the complex legacy of war and entertainment.
The moral and practical dilemmas faced by U.S. leaders, especially Henry Stimson, revolved around the necessity of using atomic bombs to avoid a costly invasion.
The psychological impact of the atomic bombings on Japan was profound, leading to internal conflicts about surrender among military and governmental factions.
Deep dives
The Context of Nuclear Weapons Use
In the summer of 1945, as World War II was nearing its end, Japan remained defiant despite facing imminent defeat. The Japanese Armed Forces were still largely intact, with millions of soldiers positioned in Asia, and a substantial number waiting for an invasion on the island of Kyushu. Despite suffering from severe blockades leading to starvation, the civilian population remained largely quiescent, showing no inclination towards rebellion. The Japanese government, meanwhile, militarized civilians in preparation for an American invasion, readying them to resist with whatever means available.
The Dilemma of American Leadership
Key U.S. figures, particularly Secretary of War Henry Stimson, faced profound moral and practical dilemmas regarding whether to use the atomic bomb against Japan. Stimson was aware of the devastating nature of the weapon, often referring to it with terms like 'Frankenstein monster' in his diary. As American troops were redeployed to the Pacific, the heavy toll of previous battles weighed heavily on his conscience, leading him to seek alternatives to a bloody invasion. However, the overwhelming determination of Japanese military leaders to continue fighting posed a serious obstacle to any negotiated peace or consideration of alternatives.
The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb
As the Allied forces debated potential targets for the atomic bomb, decisions were made that ultimately prioritized hitting a city to ensure effectiveness over considering civilian casualties. Hiroshima was chosen for its military significance, although it was also a civilian population center. The Allies underestimated the bomb's destructive potential and the resulting civilian death toll, which far outweighed initial military expectations. As discussions about demonstrating the bomb's power versus using it for actual warfare unfolded, many in the military found it more practical to ensure a decisive impact by striking prominent urban targets.
The Japanese Response and Aftermath
After the bombings, the Japanese military leadership initially struggled to process the reality and significance of the atomic attacks. With their army crippled and the emperor advocating for surrender, internal conflict arose between militarist factions and peace advocates. Foreign Minister Shigenori Togo’s push for diplomatic resolution was met with resistance from hardliners convinced that surrender would bring disgrace. Following the bombings, while the emperor's message to surrender was broadcast, there was widespread confusion among the populace that had never heard his voice before, revealing the deep psychological impact of both the war itself and the devastating use of atomic weapons.
We commemorate the 79th anniversary of the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan, by revisiting a haunting question: Was the U.S. decision to destroy two Japanese cities with atomic weapons really necessary to end World War II? Author Evan Thomas discusses the motivations of key U.S. leaders, and of Japanese commanders and diplomats. His book is The Road to Surrender.
Plus, John Powers reviews The Instigators, a new action comedy starring Matt Damon and Casey Affleck.