Iain Davis discusses the Western-led 'rules-based order' and its alternative, the Russia/China-led 'Multipolar law-based order', leading the world into an age of technocracy. Topics include: misleading terms like International Rules-Based Order and International Order, alternative model of international law-based world order, Russian cyber security and global governance, rise of technocracy during the Progressive Era, crisis in Ukraine, CIA involvement in Ukraine and war on domestic terror.
The conflict in Ukraine is not a simple dichotomy between Russia and the West, but rather a struggle for primacy within a global system of technocracy and governance.
It is crucial to consider multiple perspectives and complexities of the situation in Ukraine, and avoid oversimplifications or demonization of either side.
The self-declared people's republics in Eastern Ukraine may have legitimate claims to independence based on international law, and their denial of a referendum and ongoing shelling by the Ukrainian government further complicates the situation.
Deep dives
The Lack of Ground Reporting in Ukraine
There is a significant lack of reporting on the ground in Ukraine, making it difficult to assess the extent of the conflict or invasion. While there have been reports of Russian troops securing the Donbas region and striking military targets in Ukraine, the scale of the invasion is unclear. Fake battle footage circulating on social media further complicates the situation.
Multiple Narratives and Perspectives
The prevailing narrative in the West portrays Ukraine as a victim of aggression from Russia, while some alternative media suggests that China is the mastermind behind the conflict. However, it is essential to consider multiple perspectives and the complexity of the situation. It is crucial to distinguish between the government and the far-right elements in Ukraine, as not all Ukrainians support fascism.
The Role of Proxies in the Conflict
The conflict in Ukraine is often seen as a proxy war between the International Rules-Based Order led by the West and the emerging multipolar world order led by Russia and China. However, it is essential to remember that both sides are ultimately embracing similar systems of technocracy and global governance. The conflict may be a struggle for primacy within this system rather than a clash of fundamentally different ideologies.
The Right to Self-Determination
The self-declared people's republics in Eastern Ukraine may have legitimate claims to independence based on international law. The denial of their right to hold a referendum on independence and the ongoing shelling by the Ukrainian government have further complicated the situation. It is important to consider the complexities of the conflict and avoid oversimplifications or demonization of either side.
The Ukraine conflict and political dynamics
The podcast episode explores the history and dynamics of the conflict in Ukraine. It discusses the role of the Ukrainian government, the Ukrainian military, and the Russian-speaking population in the Donbass region. The episode highlights the political will of the current Ukrainian president, Zelensky, to improve relations with Russia and deescalate the conflict. It also touches upon the significance of the NATO expansion issue and its impact on the situation.
Potential motivations and consequences of the conflict
The podcast episode delves into the potential motivations and consequences of the conflict in Ukraine. It mentions how the West, particularly the CIA, may be instigating tension and stoking the conflict. It highlights the possibility of an insurgency being created in Ukraine and the involvement of white supremacist groups. The episode also discusses the economic deals between Russia and China, which could help Russia withstand potential Western sanctions. Additionally, it suggests that the crisis may be exploited to advance technocratic agendas and justify the implementation of a war on domestic terror.
Whitney is joined by Iain Davis to discuss how the Western-led "rules-based order" and its alternative, the Russia/China-led "Multipolar law-based order", are two sides of the same coin and are leading the world into an age of technocracy.
