
The Sunday Show
The Dumbest Timeline: The Supreme Court Rules on TikTok
Jan 18, 2025
Kate Klonick, an associate professor of law at St. John's University, dives into the Supreme Court's recent ruling upholding a ban on TikTok, analyzing its implications for freedom of expression. She discusses the political moves surrounding the decision and the potential for TikTok facing a shutdown. Klonick also explores the relationship between tech companies like Meta and political influence, plus the challenges of governance in the digital age. The conversation sheds light on how these factors may reshape the landscape of online content and user rights.
36:31
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Supreme Court upheld a law banning TikTok unless ByteDance sells it, citing no violation of First Amendment rights.
- The political maneuvering around TikTok's future reveals inconsistency in lawmakers' positions, raising concerns about the motivations behind tech regulations.
Deep dives
Supreme Court Decision on TikTok Ban
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, effectively allowing the ban of TikTok in the U.S. unless its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, divests ownership. This ruling was seen as not infringing upon the First Amendment rights of TikTok, its users, or creators, a position that surprised many legal experts. As the ban is set to go into effect on January 19, TikTok warned that it might cease operations in the U.S. unless it receives assurance regarding non-enforcement from the Biden administration, highlighting the stakes involved as the situation unfolds.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.