Michael Millerman - the Technologist and the Republic
Oct 21, 2024
auto_awesome
Michael Millerman, a philosopher and founder of the Millerman School, dives deep into the interplay of technology, politics, and philosophy. He contrasts ancient and modern views on human excellence and critiques the dangers of quantification in modernity. Millerman advocates for a blend of technical and philosophical expertise among leaders, navigating the implications of AI and cryptocurrencies. The discussion also explores the mystical facets of existence, emphasizing individual experience over grand narratives, while highlighting the Socratic approach to citizenship and moral contemplation.
Innovative founders often attain transcendence by merging traditional philosophies with modern technological pursuits, inspiring creativity and leadership in societal contexts.
The podcast contrasts the philosophical ideals of ancient thinkers seeking moral excellence with modern pragmatism focused on quantifiable metrics and fears.
Quantification in contemporary life may obscure qualitative aspects of human experience, raising concerns about balancing data-driven approaches with deeper existential inquiries.
Engaging in politics presents challenges for technologists, highlighting the need for a synthesis of technical expertise and philosophical understanding to navigate governance effectively.
Deep dives
Transcendence and Innovation in Founders
Innovative founders often find themselves in a state of transcendence as they break away from established norms, aligning themselves with various mystical and philosophical realms. This connection to higher ideals can inspire creativity and a sense of purpose, especially when grounded in traditional philosophies. For example, while speaking in El Salvador, the speaker reflects on the return of families incentivized by newfound stability, linking back to the transformative power of visionary leadership. The interplay between creativity and philosophical inquiry suggests that true innovation often arises from a blend of practical execution and higher existential quests.
Ancient vs. Modern Philosophical Orientations
The discussion contrasts the philosophical orientations of the ancients, who sought to understand human excellence through moral and intellectual virtues, with the moderns, who shifted their focus to more pragmatic and calculable concerns. Leo Strauss posits that while ancients were oriented towards the rare peaks of virtue, modern thinkers have lowered their standards to address more common human fears and desires. This shift, characterized by figures such as Machiavelli and Hobbes, poses a challenge to contemporary thought by stripping away the ideals that once elevated human aspirations. The exploration of these distinctions opens up critical discussions about the implications of these evolving philosophical frameworks on modern governance and society.
The Role of Quantity in Modern Philosophy
The conversation emphasizes the increasing prevalence of quantification in modern life, highlighting how a focus on numerical data can limit our understanding of the qualitative aspects of human experience. Philosophers like René Guénon critique this trend, arguing that an overemphasis on mathematics and calculation neglects the heterogeneous ends of human existence. Strauss points out the tension between the allure of quantitative reasoning and the deeper, qualitative mysteries of life, which often reflect our innermost thoughts and emotions. This tension reveals a crucial inquiry into how contemporary discourse can reconcile the importance of both quantitative analysis and the qualitative richness of human experience.
Technologists and the Quest for Excellence
Technologists such as Elon Musk and Sam Altman navigate a complex landscape where their ambitions for excellence collide with the practical realities of data-driven decision-making. While they may strive for aspirational goals, their work often becomes entwined with quantifiable metrics and efficiency benchmarks. Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik articulates the dual human drives of inward faith and outward exploration, suggesting that both are divinely sanctioned pursuits. This opens a dialogue about how to balance technological innovation with a deeper understanding of our spiritual and ethical responsibilities in a rapidly changing world.
The Challenge of Political Engagement
Engaging in politics presents unique challenges, particularly for those whose backgrounds are rooted in technology or innovation. Figures such as Musk and Thiel exemplify a blend of technical competence and a desire to engage in governance, yet they often struggle to navigate the complexities of political thought. This tension illustrates a gap where technical prowess may not always translate into political wisdom or understanding. The conversation urges a reconsideration of how leaders can cultivate both technical skills and a deep understanding of political philosophy to effectively address contemporary challenges.
Philosophy as a Quest for Understanding
The pursuit of philosophy is framed as an ongoing quest rather than merely a search for definitive answers, a perspective championed by thinkers like Strauss and Socrates. This emphasis on questioning acknowledges the complexity of existence and the challenges of grappling with fundamental issues such as morality, truth, and human nature. Philo-sophers are encouraged to remain sensitive to their political context while engaging in deeper existential explorations. This approach fosters a critical intellectual environment where both individual and collective human experiences can be thoughtfully examined.
The Interplay of Political Order and Personal Philosophy
The political environment significantly influences individual philosophical inquiry, shaping debates around topics like justice, freedom, and social order. Political circumstances, such as the state of democracy or the rise of tyrannical regimes, can either inhibit or inspire philosophical thought, pushing individuals to confront pressing moral questions. Figures from history, such as Kojeve and Strauss, highlight how the sequence of political regimes can reveal insights into human nature and societal development. This interplay suggests that philosophical and political domains are not mutually exclusive but rather inform and enrich one another in meaningful ways.
