Law professor Steve Vladeck discusses the Supreme Court's impact on society and democracy, reflecting on recent decisions and the consequences of political distrust. Analysis of Chief Justice Roberts' behavior and a ruling on presidential immunity raise concerns about the court's future direction. The evolution of judicial restraint and activism is explored, along with challenges to the court's credibility and potential reforms.
Supreme Court's shift towards conservatism under Chief Justice Roberts raises concerns about democratic principles.
Court's actions challenging federal agencies' powers and departure from past traditions prompt questions about judicial legitimacy.
Deep dives
The Supreme Court's Monuments Term
The podcast episode discusses the monumental term for the Supreme Court and the lack of interest shown by justices in consensus-building. Despite previous assumptions about Chief Justice Roberts' stances, his decisions during this term have raised concerns about a shift towards a more conservative approach, which surprised many observers. The Court's focus on individual rulings over forging a consensus and its departure from past practices have led to questions about the Court's direction and its impact on democratic principles.
Challenges to Administrative State Power
The podcast delves into the series of decisions made by the Supreme Court that challenge the powers of federal agencies, particularly the significant overruling of the Chevron doctrine. These decisions introduce uncertainty regarding the authority of agencies and shift power from democratically elected branches to the courts. The Court's actions in these cases highlight a departure from past procedural traditions and raise concerns about the legitimacy of judicial power.
Implications of Judicial Empowerment
The podcast explores the implications of the Supreme Court's increasing judicial power, especially in a climate of low public trust in the judiciary. By asserting more authority and making far-reaching decisions, the Court risks further polarization and challenges to its perceived impartiality. The discussion emphasizes the need for judicial restraint and adherence to constitutional principles to maintain public confidence.
Court's Handling of Key Cases
The podcast examines the Supreme Court's handling of cases related to the January 6th insurrection and an Idaho abortion ban, highlighting procedural issues and the Court's impact on public perception. The Court's actions, including the dismissal of the Idaho case and its power dynamics, raise questions about the institution's credibility and its ability to navigate contentious legal and political matters.
Stephen Vladeck is professor of law at Georgetown University. He is the author of a New York Times bestselling book, The Shadow Docket. He publishes a widely-read newsletter on the Supreme Court, One First.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode