Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear a three-part case on the constitutionality of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Because of an unusual decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, the Supreme Court is going to be evaluating three distinct challenges to the SEC at the same time. The situation arose after the 5th Circuit ruled 2-1 in favor of three separate arguments, invalidating each aspect of the SEC's operations that were being challenged. If the ruling were to go unaddressed, Congress would have to substantially change portions of the law based on the 5th Circuit's ruling, hence the Supreme Court's decision to take them all up together.

You can read today's podcast ⁠⁠here⁠⁠, our “Under the Radar” story here, and today’s “Have a nice day” story here. 

You can also check out our latest video, a previously paywalled piece about how Israel has no good options here and the controversial debate we posted on YouTube here.

Today’s clickables: Black Friday sale through this week (0:45), Quick hits (1:06), Today’s story (2:12), Right’s take (9:00), Left’s take (12:55), Isaac’s take (17:01), Listener question (21:17), Under the Radar (21:41), Numbers (22:33), Have a nice day (23:39)

You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. 

Take the poll. Which, if any, of the challenges in SEC v Jarkesy do you find convincing? Let us know!

Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and edited and engineered by Jon Lall. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75. 

Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Will Kaback, Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, and produced in conjunction with Tangle’s social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.