Hijacked Hope: Why a Decade of Mass Protest Backfired
Oct 6, 2023
auto_awesome
Vincent Bevins, veteran foreign correspondent and author of “If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and the Missing Revolution,” joins Ryan Grim to discuss the outcomes of global protests from 2010 to 2020. They explore the co-opting and repression of these movements, covering the Arab Spring, anti-austerity demonstrations in Brazil, and the hijacking of the Maidan uprising by the far right in Ukraine. They also examine the challenges of replicating successful protests, the divide between left and right in the Maidan uprising, and the power of viral videos in leaderless protests.
The lack of organization and clear goals in mass protests can hinder their effectiveness and sustainability.
External actors can co-opt the narrative of mass protests, redirecting their focus and goals.
Organized movements with clear goals and strong leadership are crucial for achieving lasting and meaningful change.
Deep dives
The rise of mass protests in the 2010s
The decade from 2010 to 2020 saw a surge of mass protests globally, with more people taking to the streets than ever before. From the Arab Spring in 2011 to mass protests in Brazil, Chile, Ukraine, Hong Kong, and beyond, these movements aimed for change. However, many of these protests did not achieve their desired outcomes, leading to a reflection on the effectiveness of such movements.
The challenges of horizontalism and leaderlessness
One common feature of mass protests in the 2010s was the embrace of horizontalism and leaderlessness. This approach emphasized individual autonomy and a rejection of traditional hierarchy and leadership. However, this lack of organization and clear goals often made it challenging to sustain the momentum and achieve concrete results. The example of Brazil's Free Fare Movement illustrates how disorganized protests can create a vacuum that is filled by right-wing movements.
The role of external influence and co-optation
External actors often played a significant role in shaping the outcomes of mass protests. In the case of Brazil, right-wing movements like the MBL capitalized on the disarray of the Free Fare Movement and gained traction with support from traditional economic elites. This co-optation of the protest narrative redirected the focus and goals of the movement. Similarly, in Ukraine, the far-right right sector took advantage of the Maidan uprising to advance their own nationalist agenda.
Lessons learned and the need for organized movements
The failures of many mass protests in the 2010s highlight the importance of organized movements with clear goals and strong leadership. Bolivia under Evo Morales exemplifies how disciplined and organized movements can achieve lasting change. Building working-class power and establishing long-term structures can provide a better foundation for creating meaningful shifts in society.
Rethinking the role of individualism and horizontalism
The emphasis on individualism and horizontalism, which marked many protests in the 2010s, may need to be reevaluated. While these principles hold appeal as a rejection of traditional power structures, they may inadvertently perpetuate atomization and hinder collective action. Finding a balance between individual autonomy and effective collective organizing is crucial for achieving meaningful change.
The 2010s bore witness to a decade of massive global protests, from the seismic events of the Arab Spring to the birth of Occupy Wall Street and the fervor of the Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong. But what tangible accomplishments emerged from these impassioned movements?
This week on Deconstructed, Ryan Grim is joined by Vincent Bevins, a veteran foreign correspondent and author of “If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and the Missing Revolution.” Bevins and Grim discuss the Arab Spring and the mass anti-austerity demonstrations in Brazil, and scrutinize the unsettling reality that, in numerous instances across various nations, conditions either stagnated or took a more repressive turn. Bevins details how more organized and, oftentimes, more authoritarian forces — ranging from organized groups to governments — were adept at harnessing the unrest, co-opting it, and ruthlessly quashing these burgeoning movements.
If you’d like to support our work, go to theintercept.com/give, where your donation, no matter what the amount, makes a real difference.
And if you haven’t already, please subscribe to the show so you can hear it every week. And please go and leave us a rating or a review — it helps people find the show. If you want to give us additional feedback, email us at Podcasts@theintercept.com.