Exploring the limits of equity and disability studies, this podcast discusses different models of disability and their implications on equity programs. It examines the importance of accommodating individuals with disabilities and raises questions about positive discrimination and societal roles in achieving equity. The podcast also explores the interplay between individual and social models of disability in relation to equity.
The podcast discusses three models of disability: the individual model, the medical model, and the social model, highlighting the interplay between these models in understanding equity.
The podcast emphasizes the importance of reasonable accommodations that balance individual and societal responsibilities for overcoming barriers and promoting inclusivity in relation to disabilities.
The podcast critiques the woke movement's approach to equity, arguing for targeting material and arbitrary impediments instead of pursuing an unrealistic goal of absolute equality.
Deep dives
The Different Models of Disability
The podcast discusses the three models of disability: the individual model, the medical model, and the social model. The individual model focuses on individual responsibility for dealing with the challenges of disability. The medical model sees disability as a medical condition that can be treated or addressed. The social model emphasizes society's role in accommodating disabilities and reducing arbitrary or unjust obstacles. The podcast highlights the importance of recognizing the interplay between these models in understanding equity.
Equity in Accommodating Disabilities
The podcast explores the concept of equity in relation to disabilities. It argues that when there are material impediments that create arbitrary or unjust restrictions for individuals with disabilities, society should make accommodations to promote equal access and opportunities. This may involve providing accessible facilities, technologies, or support services. The podcast emphasizes the need for reasonable accommodations that balance individual and societal responsibilities for overcoming barriers and promoting inclusivity.
The Limitations of Woke Equity
The podcast critiques the approach to equity advocated by the woke movement. It argues that the woke model frames society as the cause of disabilities or impediments and advocates for complete redistribution of resources to achieve equal outcomes. The podcast highlights the flaw in this approach, emphasizing that not all disparities in outcome can be attributed to systemic discrimination. It asserts that equity should be targeted at addressing material and arbitrary impediments, rather than pursuing an unrealistic goal of absolute equality.
Discrimination and Positive Discrimination
The podcast discusses the legal and conceptual implications of discrimination and positive discrimination. It mentions the Griggs versus Duke Power Supreme Court decision, which established the concept of disparate impact, allowing disparate outcomes to be treated as evidence of discrimination. The podcast explores how positive discrimination, also known as affirmative action, aims to address historical discrimination or underrepresentation by favoring certain groups. It raises questions about the legality and effectiveness of positive discrimination, highlighting the ethical considerations and unintended consequences of such policies.
Applying a Reasonable Approach to Equity
The podcast emphasizes the importance of maintaining a reasonable approach to equity. It argues for distinguishing between material and arbitrary impediments that create unjust restrictions for certain individuals or groups. It suggests that reasonable accommodations should be made to overcome these impediments without completely redistributing resources or pursuing absolute equality. The podcast underscores the need for ongoing dialogue and debate to determine the limits and parameters of equity in different contexts and to ensure the fair treatment of individuals with disabilities.
