David Faris, a politics professor at Roosevelt University and a contributing writer for Slate, dives into the heated debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. He analyzes the critical moments surrounding key issues like abortion and healthcare. Faris highlights Harris's strategic approach to contrasting herself with Trump, while critiquing Trump's lack of effective communication. The discussion also touches on how the debate could sway undecided voters and the unpredictable dynamics of the upcoming election.
Kamala Harris effectively framed herself as a candidate of change, contrasting with Donald Trump's representation of the past during the debate.
The debate revealed Trump's struggle to articulate clear policies on abortion and immigration, which could alienate undecided voters.
Deep dives
Impact of the Presidential Debate
The recent presidential debate showcased a significant moment for both candidates, with Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump engaging in a critical discussion that may influence the upcoming election. Harris aimed to reposition herself as a strong candidate, focusing on the notion of change and contrasting herself with Trump, who she characterized as a representative of the past. This debate was marked by intense viewership and high stakes, making it a pivotal moment for engaging undecided voters. Harris's performance was seen as effective, with notable reactions and memes expected to emerge from the exchanges on several key topics.
Key Issues in the Debate
Abortion emerged as a critical topic during the debate, highlighting the divide between the candidates. Harris effectively linked Trump's judicial appointments to the loss of reproductive rights in multiple states, emphasizing the consequences of his policies. As the discussion unfolded, Trump struggled to clarify his stance on the issue, failing to provide direct answers, which potentially alienated both his base and undecided voters. This lack of clarity, paired with Harris’ clear narratives of women's experiences in crisis, positioned her strongly in this discussion.
The Shift in Immigration Dialogue
Immigration policy, typically a strong area for Trump, took an unexpected turn during the debate as Harris redirected the conversation back to Trump's decisions. She pointed out that while Biden attempted to pass a bill for better border security, Trump sabotaged these efforts, illustrating a narrative of avoidance rather than resolution. Trump's subsequent remarks, which included unusual claims about immigrants, highlighted a disconnect from mainstream discourse and effectively shifted the narrative. This strategy from Harris reframed the immigration debate, undermining Trump's expected advantages in this area.
How did the first debate—with these particular candidates—go? Were minds changed?
Guest: David Faris, politics professor at Roosevelt University and a contributing writer for Slate.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.