Why Do You Believe?
Reformed, Romanist, or Rumor? A Response to Dr. Scott Oliphint
Jun 9, 2016
Dr. J. Thomas Bridges, the Academic Dean for Southern Evangelical Seminary, joins the discussion to clarify misconceptions raised by Dr. Scott Oliphint regarding SES's theological stance. They dive into the implications of Thomas Aquinas's philosophy in the Reformed tradition. The conversation critiques theological misunderstandings about dispensationalism and soteriology, emphasizing the nuanced relationship between faith, scripture, and reason. They also differentiate Thomistic philosophy from Roman Catholicism, reinforcing SES's dedication to Protestant beliefs.
00:00
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Dr. J.T. Bridges clarifies that Southern Evangelical Seminary's Thomistic philosophy does not align with Arminianism or Molinism, countering Dr. Oliphint's claims.
- The podcast emphasizes that faith, birthed by the Holy Spirit, transcends mere intellectual evaluation and requires a multifaceted apologetic approach.
Deep dives
Dr. Oliphant's Critique of Southern Evangelical Seminary
Dr. K. Scott Oliphant criticizes Southern Evangelical Seminary (SES) for its approach to philosophical theology, particularly its teachings that align with the works of Thomas Aquinas. He argues that such teachings may inadvertently lead students toward Catholicism, as evidenced by Doug Beaumont's book on his conversion and others associated with SES. Oliphant’s critique suggests that SES lacks a robust engagement with Reformed doctrines, which he believes are essential for a proper theological foundation. He perceives a significant concern with the seminary's philosophical leanings, alleging that they misrepresent core theological perspectives.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
