The Big Numbers Behind Economic Development Freebies
Dec 26, 2019
auto_awesome
John Mozena, director of the Center for Economic Accountability, dives into the astonishing $70 billion annual spending on economic development subsidies. He challenges the notion that these funds boost job creation, emphasizing the often hidden costs and lack of accountability. Mozena critiques the infamous Foxconn project in Wisconsin for its high cost per job and discusses the real versus inflated economic multipliers at play. He also highlights how these incentives can detract from crucial public services like mental health, raising important questions about their true value.
States spend about $70 billion annually on economic development subsidies, yet these programs often fail to deliver promised job creation benefits.
The prevalence of corporate welfare in economic development raises concerns about long-term fiscal health and the misleading claims surrounding job incentives.
Deep dives
The Scale of Economic Development Spending
States and localities collectively spend approximately $70 billion annually on economic development programs, which can be compared to the combined budgets of ten smaller states. This staggering amount often goes unnoticed by the public, as it is frequently framed as a necessary investment for job creation. However, many voters do not consider the implications of this spending, leading to a cycle where politicians benefit from promoting these programs while downplaying their costs. The enormity of this expenditure raises critical questions about its effectiveness, especially when juxtaposed with the social services that could have been funded instead.
The Questionable Effectiveness of Corporate Welfare
The concept of corporate welfare is prevalent in economic development discussions, with politicians often touting job creation as a primary benefit. Nonetheless, many economic development programs have shown limited effectiveness and may, in fact, harm the fiscal health of states by concentrating economic power in large corporations. Research, including mandates such as GASB 77, has demonstrated that the promised benefits of these incentives rarely come to fruition, leading to a growing skepticism about their utility. This skepticism is further fueled by case studies like the Foxconn deal in Wisconsin, where immense taxpayer investment resulted in disappointing job growth.
The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Job Creation
Analyzing the cost per job created through economic development programs reveals significant discrepancies in the assumptions surrounding job incentives. The common practice of attributing all job creation to these incentives is considered misleading and oversimplified by many economists. Factors such as infrastructure investment and the overall economic environment play crucial roles in attracting businesses, yet these are often overlooked in incentive discussions. As advocates start to challenge the narratives surrounding these programs, there is potential to shift the dialogue toward a more balanced consideration of their true costs and benefits.
The staggering sums that states and localities spend on economic development subsidies rarely deliver the benefits promised. John Mozena directs the Center for Economic Accountability.