William A. Edmundson, “John Rawls: Reticent Socialist” (Cambridge UP, 2017)
Jun 1, 2018
auto_awesome
Delving into John Rawls' political philosophy and his call for a socialist economic order, challenging traditional views of justice and social equality. Exploring Rawls's perspective on socialism, fair value, and social ownership of means of production within the framework of justice's fairness. Analyzing the evolution of Rawls's theory of justice and his focus on cultivating attitudes for social justice within society.
Rawls's theory delves into cultivating social justice attitudes in societies committed to freedom and equality.
Edmondson argues for Rawls's advocacy of a socialist economic order, challenging perceptions of Rawls as a capitalist.
Deep dives
Rawls's Theory of Justice and Political Philosophy
William Edmondson discusses John Rawls's theory of justice and political philosophy in the context of socialism. Edmondson argues that Rawls's theory attempts to address whether a society committed to freedom and equality can cultivate attitudes necessary for social justice. He explores how Rawls calls for a socialist economic order, challenging the perception of Rawls as a welfare state capitalist.
The Concept of Property-Owning Democracy vs. Liberal Democratic Socialism
Edmondson delves into the distinction between property-owning democracy and liberal democratic socialism in Rawls's work. He explains how property-owning democracy entails identifying ownership of the means of production and workplace democracy. The discussion highlights how Rawls emphasizes that socialism aligns better with securing social justice and fair political liberties.
Rawls's Reticence Towards Explicitly Embracing Socialism
Edmondson reflects on Rawls's reticence in explicitly embracing socialism despite advocating for its principles. He considers factors such as Rawls's personal characteristics, academic environment, and historical context shaping his reluctance to explicitly identify as a socialist. The discussion touches on Rawls's nuanced stance on political labels and ideological considerations.
Implications for Future Research and Non-Ideal Circumstances
Edmondson hints at future research directions focusing on Rawls's lectures engaging with political theorists like James Madison and exploring individual duties within unjust social structures. He contemplates addressing non-ideal circumstances and individual obligations amidst societal injustices, hinting at a deep philosophical inquiry beyond ideal political theories.
John Rawls is easily the most celebrated and influential political philosopher of the 20th Century, and his impact remains remarkably strong today. The central concepts with which his theory of justice begins are now components of the philosophical vernacular: The Original Position, Veil of Ignorance, Primary Goods, and his Two Principles of Justice (especially the Difference Principle) all will be well known to the majority of professional philosophers. It is less commonly acknowledged that the apparatus just referenced is but the beginning of his theory, and not its ultimate concern. Throughout his work, Rawls is attempting to address a fundamental philosophical question: Can a society committed to the freedom and equality of its citizens yet arrange social institutions in a way that reliably cultivate within persons the attitudes and dispositions required for social justice?
In John Rawls: Reticent Socialist (Cambridge UP, 2017), William A. Edmundson argues that Rawlsian justice calls for a socialist economic order. Could it be that America’s premiere political philosopher was a socialist?