On April 20, 2020, the Supreme Court released its decision in Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP holding that the Patent Office decision to hear an inter partes review (“IPR”) challenge is not subject to judicial review on time-bar grounds. The majority found that ruling otherwise would “unwind the agency’s merits decision” and “operate to save bad patent claims.”
To discuss the case we have Daniel L. Geyser, Chair, Supreme Court and Appellate Practice, Geyser, P.C.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.
