The podcast discusses the US government's announcement to purchase carbon removal and the $35M fund allocated for procurement. They explore the challenges of scaling up carbon removal without a compliance market. The panel also talks about the role of private buyers and compliance markets in driving CDR growth until 2030. They discuss the regulation of dumping materials into the ocean by the London Convention and the Regeavit protocol for carbon dioxide removal. Expectations and concerns regarding government involvement in scaling CDR are also discussed.
The U.S. Department of Energy has allocated $35 million to procure carbon removal credits, supporting four different pathways and aiming to encourage innovation and industry growth.
Government procurement of carbon removal is essential to achieve economies of scale and knowledge diffusion, but current efforts are relatively modest, requiring more substantial funding and engagement to drive progress in scaling carbon removal technologies.
Deep dives
U.S. government announces purchase of carbon removal
The U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) has announced a $35 million fund to procure carbon removal credits. The fund aims to support four different pathways: direct air capture with storage, biomass with carbon removal and storage, enhanced weathering and mineralization, and planned or managed carbon sinks. This initiative is expected to help build standards for successful carbon dioxide removal (CDR) programs and create a market to encourage innovation and industry growth. While the funding amount may be relatively modest, it can still provide a signal to encourage more government support for CDR and potentially galvanize states to develop their own programs.
Importance of government procurement for CDR
Government procurement has historically played a crucial role in kickstarting market viability and scale in various industries. In the case of carbon removal, government procurement can help achieve economies of scale and knowledge diffusion. However, current procurement efforts for carbon removal are still relatively modest, and greater resources and commitments are needed to effectively drive progress in this field. While the $35 million fund announced by the USDOE is a positive step, more substantial funding and engagement will be necessary to achieve significant advancements in scaling carbon removal technologies and addressing social and environmental impacts.
UN Article 6 process & growing standards
The UN Article 6 process is addressing the development of a carbon market for greenhouse gas emissions reductions and removals. Recent reports suggest that compliance markets will generate demand for carbon removal after 2030, with private buyers driving growth until then. The increasing number of standards and protocols, such as the Regavate protocol, aims to ensure social and environmental responsibility in carbon removal projects. However, clear guidance on what qualifies as carbon removal, as well as protocols to address energy sourcing and carbon removal's role in compensating for residual emissions, are still needed to ensure effective carbon removal strategies and avoid potential pitfalls.
Regulating ocean-based carbon removal approaches
The London Convention, which regulates ocean pollution, has released reports and amendments that address the regulation of ocean-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) approaches. The amendments set standards for scientific research, risk assessment, and minimizing environmental harm for marine geoengineering initiatives. Discussions within the convention also involve classifying different categories of enhanced ocean alkalinity, macroalgae harvesting, and upwelling, which impact how these approaches will be regulated. As the interest in ocean-based CDR grows, navigating ownership and regulatory complexities will be crucial in developing a clear framework for its implementation.
A few weeks ago, the US government announced it would directly purchase carbon removal. The Department of Energy released news of a $35 million fund to procure CDR credits. The prize fund will take the form of offtake agreements and cover four pathways.
More and more governments are funding CDR pilots, supporting research, and adding CDR targets to their climate plans. CDR has quickly entered an era of widespread support throughout North America and Europe.
But while the support is wide, it is also shallow; most policies take the form of modest grants or targets, with a few more ambitious countries leading the way.
Many CDR commentators have come to the conclusion that without a compliance market, carbon removal won’t ever scale up.
On this episode we asked our policy panel about recent government actions on CDR: will they work, are they enough, and what more needs to be done? Are today’s policies sufficient to get us where we need to go?
Radhika is joined by Wil Burns, Co-Executive Director of the Institute for Carbon Removal Law and Policy at American University, and Holly Jean Buck, Assistant Professor of Environment and Sustainability at the University at Buffalo.