The Channel McGilchrist Podcast Understanding The Matter with Things Dialogues Episode 13: Chapter 13 - Institutional science & truth
18 snips
Oct 7, 2024 Dive into the intriguing interplay between institutional science and truth, exploring how human factors influence scientific assertions. The discussion critiques the reliance on specialized knowledge and the impact of corporate interests in research. Replication's critical role in validating findings is examined, alongside the challenges of misconduct and conformity that threaten innovation. Delving into the etymology of key terms reveals deeper meanings tied to trust and genuine experience, encouraging a more inclusive and meaningful engagement with science.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Trusting Science
- Iain McGilchrist argues that science's trustworthiness improves by acknowledging its limitations.
- These limitations arise not just from scientific models but also from human factors influencing scientists.
Science Says
- The common phrase "science says" often lacks context regarding which scientists or disciplines are referenced.
- Blindly accepting this phrase overlooks the diversity of perspectives within science.
Science and Authority
- Due to specialization, most scientists rely on authority when discussing fields outside their expertise.
- Science, like religion, often relies on authority, requiring critical evaluation of the source's trustworthiness.