Very Bad Wizards

Episode 339: Is Analytic Philosophy Truthmaxxing?

47 snips
Aug 25, 2026
They debate whether analytic philosophy is narrow, pedantic, or secretly valuable for real-world issues like AI, consciousness, and animal welfare. They unpack Bernard Williams' defense of the field and Lily Hu's critique that philosophy claims a viewpoint-free stance. They also spar over the ethics and impact of academics monetizing Substack and the role of public-facing philosophical writing.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
ADVICE

Use Platform Incentives To Reach More Readers

  • If you use Substack and want discoverability, charging can increase platform promotion, so some writers monetize to be more public.
  • Tamler notes Substack's algorithm privileges paid newsletters, making paid access a strategic choice for reach.
INSIGHT

Monetization Does Not Automatically Tarnish Academia

  • Critics argue monetization sullies academia's reputation; Tamler calls that claim 'madness' and notes no evidence that paying subscribers harms the institution.
  • He emphasizes writing and outreach work often go unrewarded by universities, so extra payment can be necessary to motivate public engagement.
ANECDOTE

AI Paper Scare Highlights Academic Anxiety

  • The hosts note the AI-authored paper in Philosophy and Public Affairs as a reputational hazard, sparking alarm about AI use in academia.
  • David says campuses push 'lean in' AI workshops while many faculty want protected spaces where students must write unaided.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app