
Very Bad Wizards Episode 339: Is Analytic Philosophy Truthmaxxing?
47 snips
Aug 25, 2026 They debate whether analytic philosophy is narrow, pedantic, or secretly valuable for real-world issues like AI, consciousness, and animal welfare. They unpack Bernard Williams' defense of the field and Lily Hu's critique that philosophy claims a viewpoint-free stance. They also spar over the ethics and impact of academics monetizing Substack and the role of public-facing philosophical writing.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Use Platform Incentives To Reach More Readers
- If you use Substack and want discoverability, charging can increase platform promotion, so some writers monetize to be more public.
- Tamler notes Substack's algorithm privileges paid newsletters, making paid access a strategic choice for reach.
Monetization Does Not Automatically Tarnish Academia
- Critics argue monetization sullies academia's reputation; Tamler calls that claim 'madness' and notes no evidence that paying subscribers harms the institution.
- He emphasizes writing and outreach work often go unrewarded by universities, so extra payment can be necessary to motivate public engagement.
AI Paper Scare Highlights Academic Anxiety
- The hosts note the AI-authored paper in Philosophy and Public Affairs as a reputational hazard, sparking alarm about AI use in academia.
- David says campuses push 'lean in' AI workshops while many faculty want protected spaces where students must write unaided.




