Double Jeopardy - UK Law and Politics

Debating the Rule of Law in the UK: Hermer versus Wolfson

May 14, 2025
David Wolfson, KC, the Shadow Attorney General and former Under Secretary of State for Justice, joins for a captivating discussion on the rule of law in the UK. The conversation explores the divide between 'thin' and 'thick' interpretations of legal principle. They delve into parliamentary sovereignty, human rights debates, and the implications of international law, particularly concerning the Chagos dispute. Wolfson also addresses the impact of Brexit and Covid on the constitutional crisis, offering rare insights into the legal and political tensions shaping today's society.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Thin vs Thick Rule of Law

  • The thin rule of law means the government is governed by law and the courts are independent.
  • The thick rule of law adds human rights and international law, risking conflating law with politics.
INSIGHT

Rule of Law is Non-Partisan, But Political

  • Both David Wolfson and Richard Hermer agree the rule of law should be non-partisan.
  • But their differences reveal a deeper political divide about law's role in democracy.
INSIGHT

Human Rights and Rule of Law Distinction

  • A country banning gay marriage might still have a thin rule of law with independent courts.
  • Including rights in the rule of law risks making political judgments part of legal definition.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app