Housing, Homelessness, and the L.A. Political Machine with L.A. Councilmember Nithya Raman
Jan 3, 2024
auto_awesome
In this podcast, City Councilmember Nithya Raman discusses housing and homelessness in Los Angeles. Topics include the power struggle between homeowners and the best interests of everyone, the housing crisis and land use issues in LA, addressing the hopelessness of solving homelessness, relocating homeless individuals to project room key sites, the complex relationship between housing, drugs, and mental health, building a stable system for addressing homelessness, and the politics of homelessness in LA.
The housing crisis and rising homelessness in Los Angeles are primarily caused by decades of underbuilding and underinvestment in housing.
Los Angeles politics are experiencing a shift towards issue-based and policy-focused elections, potentially changing how housing, homelessness, and public safety are addressed.
Addressing the housing crisis and homelessness requires a comprehensive approach, including investing in mental health institutions, increasing shelter capacity, and providing non-congregate shelter options while managing expectations and navigating potential political backlash.
Deep dives
Housing Crisis and Homelessness
The podcast episode explores the housing crisis and homelessness issues in Los Angeles. It discusses how decades of underbuilding and underinvestment in housing have led to a paralyzing housing crisis and rising homelessness. The lack of affordable housing and limited availability of shelter beds contribute to the ongoing struggles in the city. Efforts are being made to address the issue, including building non-congregate shelter options and increasing the capacity of the mental health system. However, it is acknowledged that solving these issues will take time and a comprehensive approach.
Challenges in Los Angeles Politics
The podcast touches upon the challenges in Los Angeles politics, including the historical divisions based on ethnicity in representation. It discusses how certain pockets of the city have elected representatives who are believed to look after their specific interests, creating a fragmented political landscape. However, a shift is occurring with more focus on issues and policy platforms rather than strictly identity-based politics. It remains to be seen how these changes will shape the future of Los Angeles politics.
Importance of Building a Comprehensive System
The podcast emphasizes the importance of building a comprehensive system to address homelessness, mental health, and substance abuse issues. It highlights the need to invest in mental health institutions, increase shelter capacity, and provide non-congregate shelter options. The current challenges in accessing mental health services and shortage of professionals are recognized. It is acknowledged that solving these issues will require patience, efficient use of existing resources, and building additional capacity. The podcast emphasizes that compassion and understanding are crucial in addressing these complex problems.
Changing Dynamics in LA Politics
The podcast explores the changing dynamics in LA politics, with a shift towards elections where issues are debated and discussed. While historical politics based on specific ethnic constituencies still exist, there is a possibility for a new kind of politics to emerge. It is noted that elections focused on ideas and policy platforms are becoming more common, inviting the potential for change in how housing, homelessness, and public safety are addressed. However, the outcome and direction of these discussions remain open questions that will shape the future of LA politics.
Addressing Impatience and Despair
The podcast acknowledges the impatience and despair surrounding the housing crisis and homelessness in Los Angeles. It highlights the need to manage expectations regarding the pace of change. Building an effective system requires time, effort, and addressing the limitations and capacity constraints faced by service providers. The challenge lies in staying committed to long-term solutions while navigating public sentiment and potential political backlash. The podcast emphasizes the importance of ongoing discussions, patience, and belief in the possibility of creating a more compassionate and effective response to these complex issues.
Today we have a great interview with Nithya Raman, the City Councilmember for Los Angeles’s District 4. We talk about housing, the despair around the homelessness problem in California’s biggest cities, and whether there might be a different future for the city’s political machine.
My interest in Councilmember Raman started back when I was writing the newsletter for the Times because there was an effort by some of the more powerful local politicians to redraw her district in ways that would both disenfranchise many of the people who had voted for her to be their representative but also seemed to reflect the unrelenting power of homeowners in Southern California.
You can read some of those pieces here, here, and here.
What became clear to me during the reporting of those pieces was that Mike Davis was right when he wrote “the most powerful ‘social movement’ in contemporary Southern California is that of affluent homeowners, organized by notional community designations or tract names, engaged in the defense of home values and neighborhood exclusivity.”
The real battle in California, then, is between the self interests of homeowners to protect their value and the “character” of their neighborhoods and the best interests of everyone else. This is not a fight that follows basic partisan lines nor is it one that really has much coherence to it, but it’s the fight that every politician in California, especially in Los Angeles or here in the Bay Area, must navigate to get anything done.
Nithya and I talked about all that and the massive scandal in the Los Angeles City Council in 2022, where Latino members of the council and labor leaders were caught on tape making bigoted statements about pretty much every other group in the city. What those tapes revealed, at least to me, was how a type of identity politics actually functioned in the country’s second biggest city.