

A Tale Of Two Supreme Court Book Tours
Sep 17, 2025
Amy Coney Barrett and Sonia Sotomayor take very different approaches on their media tours. Barrett's clear stance on term limits wavers under pressure, while Sotomayor aims to maintain harmony despite her dissenting views. The discussion reveals how the Supreme Court justices struggle to connect authentically with the public. They also explore a clever tactic in process serving involving a mariachi band, highlighting the surprising creativity in legal maneuvers. Ropes & Gray's decision to maintain a single-tier partnership adds another layer to the conversation about law firm culture.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Court Distance Shapes Media Moments
- Supreme Court justices rarely engage directly with media and often lack media-savvy skills.
- That distance shapes public perception and creates awkward, high-stakes media moments.
Barrett's Fox Exchange On Third Term
- Amy Coney Barrett appeared on Fox, correctly stating the 22nd Amendment limits presidents to two terms.
- When pressed with a "wink wink" follow-up, she equivocated instead of simply reaffirming the text.
Silence Harms Rule-Of-Law Clarity
- Justices sometimes avoid stating black-letter law publicly, citing recusal concerns or caution.
- That practice undermines rule-of-law clarity and confuses the public about legal limits.