John Nichols, associate editor at The Capital Times and expert on electoral issues, tackles the unprecedented financial stakes in Wisconsin's Supreme Court race, reaching nearly $100 million. He reveals Elon Musk's staggering $19.3 million influence and his attempts to steer judicial appointments. Nichols discusses the ideological shift in the court and how this impacts crucial issues like abortion rights. The conversation also uncovers the sensational tactics used in campaigning and the broader implications of billionaire influence on democracy.
The unprecedented $100 million funding for the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, significantly influenced by Elon Musk, raises ethical questions about campaign financing in nonpartisan elections.
Voter concerns regarding national issues like Medicaid and Social Security are deeply intertwined with the local Supreme Court race, complicating perceptions of judicial candidates.
Deep dives
Elon Musk's Unprecedented Spending in Wisconsin Politics
The Wisconsin Supreme Court race is experiencing unprecedented financial backing, with total spending expected to reach around $100 million, marking a historical high for both the state and the nation. A significant portion of this funding comes from Elon Musk, who has contributed approximately $19.3 million to support his chosen candidate. This level of investment is not just notable for its size but also because it raises questions around the legality and ethics of Musk's involvement in what is technically a nonpartisan election. His financial influence is coupled with unconventional tactics, including financial incentives offered to voters who sign petitions opposing 'activist judges'.
Political Landscape of Wisconsin's Supreme Court
Wisconsin is recognized as a battleground state, and its Supreme Court plays a crucial role in shaping political outcomes due to its ability to intervene in pivotal issues like gerrymandering, abortion rights, and electoral disputes. The court's progressive shift, achieved through the election of liberal justices, has led to significant legal rulings that impact both state and national politics. The current candidates, progressive Susan Crawford and conservative Brad Schimmel, are framed within a heated narrative that suggests their outcomes could define the future political landscape in Wisconsin. Given the close electoral history of the state, with narrow margins frequently determining outcomes, this Supreme Court race is poised to have ripple effects beyond state lines.
Voter Sentiment and the Role of Key Issues
Voters in Wisconsin are apprehensive about broader political issues, such as threats to Medicaid and Social Security, which have become increasingly relevant in the context of the Supreme Court race. Even though this election primarily revolves around judicial qualifications, pervasive concerns about federal policies are influencing voter perceptions and decisions. Candidates' affiliations, especially with someone like Elon Musk, are being intricately linked to broader socioeconomic concerns, affecting how voters interpret their choices in this local race. The intricate ties between judicial decisions and these larger political issues highlight the complexity of voter motivation in a state characterized by its political divisions.
How an election to the Wisconsin Supreme Court has become a referendum on Elon Musk—and the most expensive state supreme court race ever.
Guest: John Nichols, associate editor at The Capital Times in Wisconsin, contributor on electoral politics and public policy for The Nation, and author of multiple books on media and politics.
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme, Ethan Oberman, and Rob Gunther.