Supreme Court rulings on disqualifying individuals for insurrection, Trump's claims on presidential immunity, Weisselberg's additional prison time, Trump's media platform and financial strategy, legal battles involving Chesabro, Hunter Biden's congressional hearing, and strategic considerations on tax charges.
State determinations for disqualifying federal candidates are invalid, requiring legislation by Congress.
Supreme Court to review Trump's presidential immunity, influencing potential federal actions and his disqualification proceedings.
Trump faces financial challenges in posting appeal bonds, with potential relief from his stakes in Trump Media through a SPAC merger.
Deep dives
Supreme Court's Ruling on 14th Amendment Disqualification
The Supreme Court ruled that disqualifying a person from office based on insurrection participation must be legislated by Congress. State determinations for disqualification of federal candidates were deemed invalid by the court. While all justices agreed on states' limitations, dissent arose on the federal government's potential role.
Scope of Presidential Immunity in Question
The Supreme Court will assess the extent of presidential immunity, particularly analyzing Donald Trump's immunity regarding his actions post-2020 election to the lead-up to January 6. The Court's decision may influence potential federal actions against Trump, aiming to prevent any chaotic crisis surrounding his disqualification.
Bonds and Legal Actions Against Donald Trump
Donald Trump faces the need to post substantial bonds totaling hundreds of millions due to judgments in legal cases against him. His stakes in Trump Media through a SPAC merger could offer financial relief, yet legal entanglements and ongoing litigation pose challenges in accessing this potential financial resource.
Proceedings Involving Hunter Biden
Hunter Biden testified before a congressional committee about his business undertakings, divulging numerous details and rebutting accusations. His combative testimony addressed business activities and distanced his father from any involvement. While the open dialogue was atypical for a criminal defendant, potential consequences on his ongoing tax case were considered.
Strategic Challenges Faced by Hunter Biden
Hunter Biden's public testimony and confrontational approach in legal proceedings against him raise strategic questions, as he navigates risks concerning potential charges and political influences on his cases. The focus on tax-related offenses alongside broader implications of partisan-driven prosecutions underscores the complex strategic considerations in his legal battles.
Legal Developments and Strategic Implications
The discussions around Hunter Biden's testimony, legal challenges, and strategic decisions shed light on the intricate balance between managing legal exposure, political motivations, and defense strategies. The interplay between ongoing legal cases, partisan influences, and potential repercussions underscores the multifaceted nature of navigating complex legal battles.
The Supreme Court is asserting itself in matters related to Donald Trump. The justices held unanimously that states may not block Donald Trump from their election ballots on the grounds of 14th Amendment disqualification, though the justices did have a sharp disagreement about the court’s choice to foreclose other non-congressional federal paths to disqualifying Trump or other candidates who may have engaged in insurrection. Meanwhile, the court will consider Trump’s claims about presidential immunity, and on an expedited basis — oral arguments will be next month, with a decision expected by late June. That sets up the awkward possibility that Trump’s criminal trial related to January 6 will begin in the fall and be ongoing on Election Day, if Judge Tanya Chutkan is serious about her stated intention not to let a defendant’s busy schedule get in the way of a trial.
Trump’s deadlines to post his appeal bonds approach, with courts so far unimpressed with his requests for delays and discounts. What happens if he fails to post sufficient bonds? And where could hundreds of millions of dollars come from? Allen Weisselberg is getting a little more prison time — this time for lying about the lies about the size of Trump’s penthouse — and Ken and I discuss why we feel… well, we don’t exactly feel sorry for him, but we do find something a little odd about how it’s Allen who keeps getting sentenced to custody when he’s not exactly the primest mover behind Trump-entity misdeeds. And Hunter Biden talked to a congressional committee, and when he did so he really talked.
Visit serioustrouble.show to find a transcript of this episode and to sign up for our newsletter.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.serioustrouble.show/subscribe
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
