Truth Unites
Why Full Preterism is the Worst End Times View
May 7, 2025
Gavin Ortlund critiques full preterism and contrasts it with partial preterism, shedding light on their differing implications for Christian hope. He emphasizes the importance of historical and theological context in shaping eschatological beliefs. The discussion encourages Christians to engage in informed conversations about these views, exploring the line between orthodox faith and heretical perspectives.
25:49
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Gavin Ortlund critiques full preterism as heretical for claiming all eschatological events occurred in the first century.
- Partial preterism is distinguished as aligning with orthodox beliefs, allowing for crucial future events like the resurrection to remain anticipated.
Deep dives
Understanding Preterism in Eschatology
Preterism, stemming from the Latin word meaning 'past,' is a significant interpretative approach to the eschatological events described in the New Testament. It posits that many predictions regarding the end times were fulfilled in the first century, especially related to the destruction of Jerusalem and the Great Tribulation. This contrasts with modern evangelical perspectives that often lack historical precedent, suggesting a different interpretation that encompasses a broader understanding of Christian eschatology. Recognizing preterism's historical roots illustrates how the Church has grappled with these concepts over centuries, reflecting on the implications of various eschatological views.
