Will SCOTUS Force ER Doctors to Abandon Patients Who Need Abortions?
Apr 19, 2024
auto_awesome
The podcast discusses the upcoming Supreme Court oral arguments on abortion laws, focusing on the impact on ER doctors. They explore fetal personhood in relation to abortion rights and the challenges faced by doctors in states with medical treatment restrictions. The hosts also mention utilizing social media for engagement during the discussions.
The conflict between state and federal laws regarding abortion could impact emergency room doctors' obligations under the EMTALA.
The abortion cases before SCOTUS have broader implications on federalism and the balance of power between state and federal regulations.
Deep dives
The Argument in the Idaho vs. United States and Moyle vs. United States Case
The podcast delves into the upcoming oral arguments in abortion cases before the Supreme Court, particularly focusing on the Idaho vs. United States and Moyle vs. United States cases. These cases center around the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), which mandates that Medicare-funded ERs offer medical exams, stabilizing treatments, or hospital transfers as necessary. The discussion highlights the conflict between state and federal laws regarding abortion and the potential implications of a Supreme Court ruling on the healthcare system, especially for emergency room doctors.
Federalism and the Battle Over State vs. Federal Law
Another key point explored in the podcast is the broader implications of the abortion cases on federalism and the relationship between state and federal laws. The conflict between Idaho state law and federal law regarding abortion as a form of stabilizing treatment raises concerns about the conservative legal movement's impact on the balance of power between state and federal regulations. The discussion underscores the potential consequences of siding with Idaho in terms of setting precedents for future healthcare policies beyond abortion.
Personhood Debate and Healthcare Consequences
The podcast scrutinizes the concept of fetal personhood and its relevance to the abortion cases, emphasizing the impact on pregnant individuals' healthcare rights. The debate surrounding whether a fetus is a patient under EMTALA reveals challenges in balancing the rights of pregnant persons with the status of the fetus. The episode also sheds light on the potential chilling effect on emergency healthcare practices if states like Idaho can dictate what constitutes healthcare, posing risks to medical decision-making and patients' access to critical treatments beyond abortion.
It’s time for oral arguments in the second abortion case this Supreme Court season, one that Jess and Imani have both written and talked a lot about in the last year. In this week's episode, they share what they'll be listening for during Wednesday's arguments.
They'll also be bringing you their rapid reactions later that day, so be sure to tune in.
Rewire News Group is a nonprofit media organization, which means Boom! Lawyered is only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.
And sign up for The Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that’s exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode