Psychiatry & Psychotherapy Podcast Where Psychiatry Meets Politics: The Goldwater Rule
22 snips
Aug 7, 2024 Dr. David Puder, a psychiatrist with a focus on the intersection of psychiatry and politics, joins Dr. Mark Mullen, who delves into the ethical implications of the Goldwater Rule. They explore the historical context of this rule that arose during the 1964 presidential campaign and its ethical dilemmas for psychiatrists concerning public figures. The discussion highlights the challenges of diagnosing without consent, the impact of media perceptions, and the need for careful navigation of ethical boundaries in mental health discourse.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Purpose of the Goldwater Rule
- The Goldwater Rule emerged to guide psychiatrists against public professional commentary about public figures based only on media.
- It protects psychiatry from mistakes and preserves professional integrity.
Core Principle of Goldwater Rule
- The Goldwater Rule prohibits psychiatrists from giving professional opinions on public figures without examination and consent.
- This line distinguishes between personal views and professional psychiatric opinions.
Goldwater Survey Embarrasses Psychiatry
- In 1964, psychiatrists responded to Fact Magazine’s survey about Barry Goldwater's mental fitness for presidency without personal evaluation.
- Many psychiatrists gave opinions ranging from fit to highly critical, showing the field’s embarrassment afterwards.