

"The FBI Is LYING" - Charlie Kirk Assassination Mystery EXPLODES With Secret UVU Campus Construction
Oct 2, 2025
The panel dives into new footage surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination, questioning the integrity of the crime scene. They argue over whether an object near Kirk's ear is an earpiece or blood. Forensic experts weigh in on potential exit wounds and gun claims, while the rapid construction at UVU raises eyebrows. Concerns about evidence handling and missing transparency from authorities are rampant. With public trust dwindling, they urge critical examination of narratives and call for honesty in investigative processes.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Video Shows Earpiece Not Blood
- The panel analyzes footage frame-by-frame and concludes what looked like blood was likely an earpiece wire moving after an impact.
- They argue the visible neck damage resembles an exit wound rather than an entry wound based on multiple forensic commentators.
Forensics Suggest Exit Wound
- Tom Ellsworth and others say forensic analysts view the neck wound as an exit wound, not an entry wound.
- They question how a catastrophic front-of-neck wound could appear like an exit without clear ballistics presented.
Calls To UVU Hit Dead Ends
- Vinny recounts calling UVU and being redirected, then hearing staff refuse to discuss construction at the site.
- He describes being unable to reach the university VP despite leaving messages asking why the scene was altered.