Quantitude S1E29: Quanti•Qamp II: Choosing a Journal
14 snips
Jun 9, 2020 The hosts kick off with a quirky coincidence that sets a lighthearted tone. They dive into the nitty-gritty of selecting the perfect journal for quantitative work, mixing personal anecdotes and humor. There's a heartfelt reflection on how reviewer feedback can pivot academic careers. A fun comparison of nurturing ideas in academia to parenting adds depth. They emphasize thorough research about potential journals and share practical tips for boosting chances of acceptance. Light banter keeps the atmosphere enjoyable as they prep for the next Quanti•Qamp challenge.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Unexpected Impact of an Old Review
- Greg Hancock found a 21-year-old review he wrote anonymously for Patrick Curran’s paper.
- This old review unexpectedly influenced Patrick's research trajectory significantly.
Start Journals Narrowed by Idea
- Narrow down your journals early based on your idea’s focus and scope.
- Iteratively refine both your idea and target outlet as your work matures.
Let Papers Find Their Persona
- Papers should develop naturally like children, growing into their true persona.
- Forcing a paper to fit a journal outlet can harm its authenticity and quality.