Psychology professor Matthew Vess and Apologetics professor Sean McDowell discuss the role of belief and faith in achieving goals, the claims of Christianity, the nature of faith in relation to evidence, the development of culture as a solution to the question of death, and the role of Islam and Christianity in coping with death.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Beliefs provide a sense of meaning and coping mechanism for mortality, regardless of their objective truth.
Faith involves trust and reasons to believe, not solely scientific verifiability, and beliefs worth dying for may not always be scientifically testable.
Deep dives
The Function of Beliefs and Coping with Mortality
Beliefs play an important role in helping humans cope with the awareness of their own mortality. This psychological function is present across different cultures and belief systems. Symbolic immortality projects, such as religion or leaving a lasting legacy, provide a sense of meaning and offer explanations for the afterlife. From a psychological standpoint, the function of beliefs does not depend on whether they are objectively true or not. People defend beliefs that give their lives meaning and become more willing to die for those beliefs when reminded of mortality, regardless of religious affiliation. The data suggests that the need to feel that one's beliefs are valid is a common psychological need, independent of the specific content of those beliefs.
The Role of Faith and Testing Beliefs
Faith is not about blindly believing something without evidence, but rather about trusting in something based on reasons to believe it is true. Faith can involve confidence and is not purely based on scientific verifiability. Some beliefs that are worth believing in may not be scientifically testable. The tension between a scientific worldview and a religious worldview arises when we perceive them to be at odds, but they can be seen as distinct from each other. Beliefs that are important enough to be worth dying for may not always be verifiable through science, and existential threats may require a belief that functions existentially rather than purely based on scientific evidence.
Evaluating Beliefs Objectively
When evaluating beliefs objectively, it is important to acknowledge and minimize biases. Being transparent about personal beliefs and biases, implementing rigorous historical methodology, and seeking constructive peer review are ways to approach beliefs and minimize subjectivity. Testing beliefs can involve examining historical evidence, philosophical analysis, and considering the philosophical implications of human experiences. Different worldviews may interpret the same data differently, and understanding the nature of belief systems can help in examining different explanations for beliefs and how they are justified.
Sometimes belief can get you the job, secure the win, or help you make a difference. And, sometimes, belief doesn't seem to help at all. So, can we know which beliefs are worth believing in? And, when do we just need to take a leap of faith?
In today’s episode, our speakers wrestle with these questions. Psychology professor Matthew Vess (Texas A&M) is in dialogue with Sean McDowell (Biola), a professor of Apologetics. They discuss how certainty and belief interact and whether the claims of Christianity could ever be worth dying for.
This Forum event was held at Texas A&M in Spring 2023. Thank you to the Forum planning team who made this discussion possible!