Brendan O'Connor Can Artificial Intelligence write better poetry than a poet?
Jul 12, 2025
In this thought-provoking discussion, Rita Ann Higgins, a satirical poet from Galway, Ireland, and tech expert Mark Little explore if AI can truly craft poetry on par with humans. They compare an AI-generated poem to one of Rita's original works, discussing creativity, authenticity, and the soul's essence in artistic expression. The duo also addresses the ethical implications of AI in the arts and the mixed feelings many have about technology's impact on human creativity, prompting listeners to reflect on the evolving landscape of art in a digital age.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Poetry Identification Experiment
- Rita Ann Higgins read two poems: one real and one AI-generated. Listeners tried to identify which was authentic, sparking debate on AI's closeness to real poetry.
- Most listeners wrongly identified the real poem, showing AI's surprising ability to mimic human poetry convincingly.
Why AI Poetry Feels More Human
- AI-generated poems can appear more human and appealing because people often don't fully understand poetry. This causes many to mistake AI's simpler, coherent poems for genuine human work.
- The homogenization of cultural content makes AI-produced art feel familiar and thus more acceptable to the public.
AI Detection Uncertainty
- AI detection tools gave contradictory results, with one claiming both poems were AI and another saying both were human. This showcases the difficulty in distinguishing AI-generated content from human-created poetry.
- The blurred line challenges existing methods of identifying AI influence in creative works.