JAMAevidence The Rational Clinical Examination
The Rational Clinical Examination: Interview with Dr. David Simel
Jan 26, 2009
Dr. David Simel, a leader in clinical examination, joins Joan Stephenson, PhD, an expert in evidence-based medicine, to discuss enhancing diagnostic skills. They explore the balance of theory and practice in clinical examinations, emphasizing the importance of scientifically evaluating techniques. The conversation highlights the evolution of their foundational work in integrating new research and structured reviews. They stress the value of identifying useful examination techniques while moving away from outdated methods for improved patient care.
15:33
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The podcast emphasizes the importance of combining scientific evidence with clinical experience to enhance diagnostic accuracy in medical examinations.
- Future developments in the Rational Clinical Examination Series will focus on integrating new literature and improving bedside techniques based on user feedback.
Deep dives
The Need for a New Approach to Clinical Examination
The Rational Clinical Examination Series addresses a critical gap in the teaching and practice of clinical examinations by introducing a quantitative and scientific basis for physical assessment and history taking. Traditionally, practitioners relied on methods handed down without a rigorous evaluation of their effectiveness, often leading to subjective interpretations. The series seeks to enhance the understanding of clinical findings, providing evidence on how well specific examination techniques can predict medical conditions, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. This aims to foster a more informed and systematic approach among both learners and experienced clinicians.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
