Media Quits Biden Cognitive Fitness Cover-Up, and Trump Gets Massive Immunity Ruling From Supreme Court, with Charlie Kirk | Ep. 827
Jul 1, 2024
auto_awesome
Author Charlie Kirk discusses the media not covering up Biden's cognitive decline. The Supreme Court rules massive immunity for Trump. Justice Thomas warns Jack Smith, Barrett's alarming rulings, and Sotomayor's 'treason' comment are analyzed.
Justice Sotomayor's treason accusation against Trump ignites debate on judicial language.
Interplay of power dynamics within Democratic Party exposes struggles for succession and evolution.
Deep dives
Presidential Immunity Granted for Official Acts
The Supreme Court decision granting absolute immunity for a president's official acts affects ongoing cases against Trump. Specific legal arguments question the authority of the special counsel, Jack Smith, in bringing charges against Trump. Justice Thomas emphasizes the need for authorized individuals to handle such prosecutions, potentially impacting Trump's defense in the Mar-a-Lago case.
Critique of Justice Sotomayor's Accusation of Treason
Justice Sotomayor's accusation of 'treasonous acts' against Trump in her dissent raises concerns about judicial language. Such severe accusations heighten tensions and risk inflaming political divides. The reluctance to afford accused individuals the presumption of innocence can have far-reaching consequences, especially when such accusations come from a Supreme Court Justice.
Clarence Thomas' Not-so-Subtle Warning to Jack Smith
In his concurring opinion, Justice Thomas indirectly addresses Jack Smith's role as special counsel in Trump's cases and casts doubt on the legitimacy of his appointment. Thomas's potential influence on the court's conservative faction suggests a precarious future for Smith's prosecution efforts, especially in the Mar-a-Lago case.
Analysis of Amy Coney Barrett's Technocratic Approach
Amy Coney Barrett's concurrence in the presidential immunity decision reveals a technocratic viewpoint focused on legal interpretation and specific statutory applications. Her nuanced rationale demonstrates a meticulous and detail-oriented legal approach, potentially influencing outcomes in future court decisions.
Joe Biden's Debate Performance and Age Concerns
The podcast delves into the aftermath of Joe Biden's debate performance, highlighting concerns about his ability to lead due to his age. The discussion focuses on how Biden's advisors and defenders attribute his debate struggles to factors like lack of sleep, stress, and age, emphasizing the need for him to manage these challenges effectively. There is a comparison drawn between Biden's personal history of comebacks and the current scrutiny on his mental faculties, leading to questions about his readiness to govern.
Political Power Dynamics within the Democratic Party
The episode sheds light on the internal power dynamics within the Democratic Party, reflecting on the entrenched leadership of figures like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. It discusses the intergenerational struggle for control and the reluctance of older party members to relinquish power. The podcast highlights a perceived lack of succession planning and the influence exerted by longtime Democratic operatives, raising concerns about the party's ability to adapt and evolve.
The Role of Joe Biden and the Administrative State
The podcast explores the concept of the 'administrative state' influencing the current U.S. government, suggesting that Joe Biden may not be the sole decision-maker in key matters. It discusses how Biden's presidency is viewed as being guided by a group of experts and advisors, overshadowing his individual authority. The episode raises questions about the transparency and accountability of this behind-the-scenes influence, hinting at a broader critique of the traditional presidential power structure.
Megyn Kelly begins the show by discussing the very real possibility President Joe Biden could drop out as the nominee by the end of the week, as corporate media outlets favorable to Biden are now calling for him to drop out. But will he listen? Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk, author of "Right Wing Revolution," joins to talk about whether Democratic politicians will start turning on Biden, the corporate media no longer willing to engage in the Biden cognitive decline cover-up anymore, whether it could be Jill Biden that takes over as the nominee, MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski pushing ridiculous pro-Biden spin this morning, one Biden surrogate assuring there's a "team of people that will help govern," who really might be running the country, whether Democrats will look to avoid a "Ruth Bader Ginsburg" situation by pushing Biden out as nominee, the initial calls for Biden to step down but then the push to blame Biden's advisers, Trump's smart debate strategy of letting Biden fail, CNN moderators' surprisingly strong performance, the massive ruling for Trump when it comes to immunity, the difference between official and unofficial acts as president, how the ruling could affect the Georgia and Florida cases too, Justice Clarence Thomas' warning to Jack Smith as part of the SCOTUS immunity ruling, Justice Amy Coney Barrett's alarming recent judicial rulings, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson joining with the conservatives on January 6 ruling, Justice Sonia Sotomayor "treason" comment, and more.
