POLITICO Energy This Supreme Court case could dramatically change NEPA
4 snips
Dec 11, 2024 Alex Guillén, an energy reporter for POLITICO Pro, discusses a pivotal Supreme Court case that may limit federal agencies' ability to assess climate impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act. He highlights tensions between environmental concerns and infrastructure development, particularly around a crude oil railway in Utah. The conversation also covers how differing ideological views among justices could reshape the energy project approval process, potentially leading to expedited permits for major investors promised by President-elect Trump.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
NEPA's Scope
- The Supreme Court case regarding the Utah railway line has broader implications beyond the project itself.
- It concerns the scope of environmental review for energy infrastructure projects under NEPA.
Impact on Energy Regulation
- The Supreme Court's ruling could significantly impact the energy regulatory landscape.
- A broader review scope could delay projects, while a narrower scope might expedite approvals.
Non-Binding CEQ Guidance
- A recent D.C. Circuit ruling clarified that White House CEQ guidance on NEPA implementation is non-binding.
- Agencies still must comply with NEPA, but the White House's ability to enforce uniform standards is limited.