The Current Is Trump’s Board of Peace a threat to the UN?
Jan 27, 2026
Michael O'Hanlon, a Brookings foreign policy and defense expert, weighs in on Trump's Board of Peace. He discusses how the board fits U.S. strategy and its potential to reinforce a two-state vision. He explores risks from vague mandates, the challenge of allies' responses, and how the plan reflects a maximalist, unpredictable U.S. approach.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Board Of Peace Exceeds Its Original Mandate
- The Board of Peace was authorized to oversee Gaza's ceasefire but the U.S. envisions a much broader role.
- Its mandate isn't limited to Gaza and includes a $1 billion contribution condition for permanent seats, raising global skepticism.
Leadership And Ambition Raise Red Flags
- The Board appears dominated by Trump and his allies despite competent experts being involved.
- Dominance by one leader and unclear ambitions prompts countries to study the proposal before joining.
Study The Board Before Committing
- Canada should assess the board's real workings before committing rather than rush to join.
- Evaluate how the Board will coordinate with UN agencies and whether it respects foundational policies like two-state language.
