The Crisis Room Q&A: Interviewing Sergei Skripal, potential SAS prosecutions & protecting overseas citizens from terror
Dec 8, 2025
Mark shares intriguing details from his interviews with Sergei Skripal before the infamous poisoning incident. Amber dissects the quick attribution of blame to Russia and the scientific evidence supporting it. The hosts delve into the complexities of government roles in safeguarding citizens abroad, alongside the challenges of responding to terrorist threats. Unpacking the potential SAS prosecutions, they explore serious allegations and the murky waters of military accountability post-Afghanistan. It's a thought-provoking discussion packed with insights!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Negotiating A Sensitive Interview Reveal
- Mark Urban kept his agreement not to name Sergei Skripal initially and waited for permission before revealing he'd interviewed him.
- He felt sorrow for Skripal and was eventually given a nod by intermediaries that it was okay to disclose the meetings.
Novichok Has A Distinct Molecular Footprint
- Amber Rudd said Novichok carries a molecular and historical footprint linking it to Soviet/Russian programmes.
- The inquiry and Porton Down evidence narrowed attribution to a government lab and linked the accused GRU officers via traces found in London.
The Politics Behind 'Highly Likely'
- Amber Rudd acknowledged intense pressure to reach attribution quickly because diplomatic responses depended on it.
- Using the phrase 'highly likely' balanced prompt international action with legal caution after Iraq intelligence controversies.