George Grylls, Defence Correspondent for The Times, provides insights into the underwater conflict with Russian forces. He highlights alarming activities of Russian spy ships lurking near UK waters, raising national security concerns. The discussion covers the vulnerability of critical infrastructure like telecom cables and NATO's strategic responses. Grylls also delves into the covert operations of shadow fleets and oil tankers, emphasizing the rise of geopolitical tensions and the potential for sabotage in this new Cold War era.
The increased Russian surveillance of underwater infrastructure, particularly through spy ships, indicates a significant threat to national security and global communication networks.
NATO's coordinated military efforts, exemplified by Operation Baltic Sentry, highlight a collective commitment to protect undersea cables and deter potential aggressors in international waters.
Deep dives
Increased Russian Naval Activity
Recent incidents have highlighted the increased presence of Russian spy ships near British waters, particularly the activities of the Yantar, which has been surveilling critical underwater infrastructure like telecommunications cables and pipelines. The Defence Secretary's acknowledgment of these vessels in Parliament signals a new level of concern regarding Russian surveillance and potential sabotage. The Royal Navy's decision to deploy nuclear submarines in proximity to such ships emphasizes a proactive stance to deter any hostile intentions. This increased naval engagement reflects the broader tensions reminiscent of the Cold War, with the UK taking significant steps to safeguard its maritime boundaries.
Vulnerabilities of Undersea Infrastructure
The reliance of modern economies on undersea cables and pipelines makes them a prime target for potential sabotage, as evidenced by recent mysterious incidents involving damaged infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. Over 95% of global internet traffic relies on these cables, and any disruption could have catastrophic effects on communication and energy supplies. Hostile actors like Russia and China could exploit this vulnerability through covert actions, creating economic chaos while maintaining plausible deniability. This necessity for vigilance has prompted the UK to alter its naval rules of engagement to better protect these critical assets from both surveillance and potential sabotage.
International Responses to Maritime Threats
In light of the growing maritime threats, countries are increasingly coordinating their military responses to protect undersea cables from possible disruption. Recent incidents involving oil tankers dragging anchors and severing cables have raised alarm, with nations like Finland taking decisive action by boarding such vessels to investigate suspicious activity. NATO's Operation Baltic Sentry reflects a unified approach among member states to secure these vital infrastructure networks in international waters, demonstrating a commitment to deter potential aggressors. The military collaboration underscored by these developments illustrates a shift towards a more aggressive posture against perceived threats from Russia and emphasizes the necessity for international solidarity in maintaining maritime security.
Last week a Russian spy ship was spotted off the coast of the UK. The Royal Navy was sent to closely monitor the vessel as it passed through British waters. It’s the latest in a series of incidents across Europe, some culminating in catastrophic damage to critical underwater cables. So what is Russia trying to achieve? And what are the UK and NATO doing about it?
This podcast was brought to you thanks to the support of readers of The Times and The Sunday Times. Subscribe today: http://thetimes.com/thestory
Guest: George Grylls, Defence Correspondent, The Times.