

June 18, 2025: Trump’s choice on Iran
8 snips Jun 18, 2025
Nahal Toosi, a senior foreign affairs correspondent at POLITICO, provides insights into the complex U.S.-Iran dynamics amid rising geopolitical tensions. She breaks down the options available to Trump, emphasizing that decisions range from targeted strikes to broader military actions. The conversation highlights the implications for regional security and the political viability of Trump's coalition. Toosi further examines the human impact of such strategies on the people of Iran, capturing the fears and uncertainties that accompany military conflict.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Trump Likely to Support Israel Militarily
- President Trump is likely to support Israel with significant military aid against Iran's nuclear facilities.
- This decision reflects a strategy to set back Iran's nuclear program rather than full-scale involvement.
Conflict Not Necessarily Binary
- Conflict escalation is not viewed in binary terms by Trump or experts; a single strike doesn't mean full war.
- Past U.S. strikes in Syria show targeted actions can occur without broader invasions.
Escalation Depends on Reactions
- The aftermath depends heavily on Iranian and Israeli responses to strikes.
- One-off U.S. actions may remain limited if Iran avoids escalating attacks on American targets.